[PATCH] D30941: Better testing of schedule model instruction latencies/throughputs

Simon Pilgrim via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 14 10:15:00 PDT 2017

Previous message: [PATCH] D30941: Better testing of schedule model instruction latencies/throughputs
Next message: [PATCH] D30941: Better testing of schedule model instruction latencies/throughputs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RKSimon added a comment.

How feasible is it to include the instruction's throughput in the comment as well?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D30941

Previous message: [PATCH] D30941: Better testing of schedule model instruction latencies/throughputs
Next message: [PATCH] D30941: Better testing of schedule model instruction latencies/throughputs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list