[llvm] r297142 - [ARM] Correct handling of LSL #0 in an IT block
John Brawn via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 7 06:42:03 PST 2017
Author: john.brawn
Date: Tue Mar 7 08:42:03 2017
New Revision: 297142
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=297142&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Correct handling of LSL #0 in an IT block
The check for LSL #0 in an IT block was checking if operand 4 was zero, but
operand 4 is the condition code operand so it was actually checking for LSLEQ.
Fix this by checking operand 3, which really is the immediate operand, and add
some tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30692
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/AsmParser/ARMAsmParser.cpp
llvm/trunk/test/MC/ARM/lsl-zero.s
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/AsmParser/ARMAsmParser.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/AsmParser/ARMAsmParser.cpp?rev=297142&r1=297141&r2=297142&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/AsmParser/ARMAsmParser.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/AsmParser/ARMAsmParser.cpp Tue Mar 7 08:42:03 2017
@@ -8940,7 +8940,7 @@ unsigned ARMAsmParser::checkTargetMatchP
inITBlock())
return Match_RequiresNotITBlock;
// LSL with zero immediate is not allowed in an IT block
- if (Opc == ARM::tLSLri && Inst.getOperand(4).getImm() == 0 && inITBlock())
+ if (Opc == ARM::tLSLri && Inst.getOperand(3).getImm() == 0 && inITBlock())
return Match_RequiresNotITBlock;
} else if (isThumbOne()) {
// Some high-register supporting Thumb1 encodings only allow both registers
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/MC/ARM/lsl-zero.s
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/MC/ARM/lsl-zero.s?rev=297142&r1=297141&r2=297142&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/MC/ARM/lsl-zero.s (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/MC/ARM/lsl-zero.s Tue Mar 7 08:42:03 2017
@@ -122,19 +122,33 @@
itt eq
lsleq r0, r1, #0
lslseq r0, r1, #0
+ itt gt
+ lslgt r0, r1, #0
+ lslsgt r0, r1, #0
// CHECK-NONARM: moveq.w r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x4f,0xea,0x01,0x00]
// CHECK-NONARM: movseq.w r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x5f,0xea,0x01,0x00]
+// CHECK-NONARM: movgt.w r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x4f,0xea,0x01,0x00]
+// CHECK-NONARM: movsgt.w r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x5f,0xea,0x01,0x00]
// CHECK-ARM: moveq r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x01,0x00,0xa0,0x01]
// CHECK-ARM: movseq r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x01,0x00,0xb0,0x01]
+// CHECK-ARM: movgt r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x01,0x00,0xa0,0xc1]
+// CHECK-ARM: movsgt r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x01,0x00,0xb0,0xc1]
itt eq
moveq r0, r1, lsl #0
movseq r0, r1, lsl #0
+ itt gt
+ movgt r0, r1, lsl #0
+ movsgt r0, r1, lsl #0
// CHECK-NONARM: moveq.w r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x4f,0xea,0x01,0x00]
// CHECK-NONARM: movseq.w r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x5f,0xea,0x01,0x00]
+// CHECK-NONARM: movgt.w r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x4f,0xea,0x01,0x00]
+// CHECK-NONARM: movsgt.w r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x5f,0xea,0x01,0x00]
// CHECK-ARM: moveq r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x01,0x00,0xa0,0x01]
// CHECK-ARM: movseq r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x01,0x00,0xb0,0x01]
+// CHECK-ARM: movgt r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x01,0x00,0xa0,0xc1]
+// CHECK-ARM: movsgt r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x01,0x00,0xb0,0xc1]
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list