[PATCH] D30632: [LoopUnrolling] Fix loop size check for peeling

Max Kazantsev via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Mar 6 19:24:13 PST 2017


mkazantsev updated this revision to Diff 90782.
mkazantsev marked 4 inline comments as done.

https://reviews.llvm.org/D30632

Files:
  lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnrollPeel.cpp


Index: lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnrollPeel.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnrollPeel.cpp
+++ lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnrollPeel.cpp
@@ -75,7 +75,9 @@
   // its only back edge. If there is such Phi, peeling 1 iteration from the
   // loop is profitable, because starting from 2nd iteration we will have an
   // invariant instead of this Phi.
-  if (auto *BackEdge = L->getLoopLatch()) {
+  auto *BackEdge = L->getLoopLatch();
+  assert(BackEdge && "Loop is not in simplified form?");
+  if (LoopSize <= UP.Threshold) {
     BasicBlock *Header = L->getHeader();
     // Iterate over Phis to find one with invariant input on back edge.
     bool FoundCandidate = false;


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D30632.90782.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 739 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20170307/05afc90c/attachment.bin>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list