[llvm] r296366 - [InlineFunction] add nonnull assumptions based on argument attributes
Sanjay Patel via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 27 10:13:48 PST 2017
Author: spatel
Date: Mon Feb 27 12:13:48 2017
New Revision: 296366
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=296366&view=rev
Log:
[InlineFunction] add nonnull assumptions based on argument attributes
This was suggested in D27855: have the inliner add assumptions, so we don't
lose nonnull info provided by argument attributes.
This still doesn't solve PR28430 (dyn_cast), but this gets us closer.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29999
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/InlineFunction.cpp
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/arg-attr-propagation.ll
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/InlineFunction.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/InlineFunction.cpp?rev=296366&r1=296365&r2=296366&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/InlineFunction.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/InlineFunction.cpp Mon Feb 27 12:13:48 2017
@@ -1093,38 +1093,52 @@ static void AddAliasScopeMetadata(CallSi
}
}
-/// If the inlined function has non-byval align arguments, then
-/// add @llvm.assume-based alignment assumptions to preserve this information.
-static void AddAlignmentAssumptions(CallSite CS, InlineFunctionInfo &IFI) {
- if (!PreserveAlignmentAssumptions || !IFI.GetAssumptionCache)
+/// Add @llvm.assume-based assumptions to preserve information supplied by
+/// argument attributes because the attributes will disappear after inlining.
+static void addAssumptions(CallSite CS, InlineFunctionInfo &IFI) {
+ if (!IFI.GetAssumptionCache)
return;
AssumptionCache *AC = &(*IFI.GetAssumptionCache)(*CS.getCaller());
auto &DL = CS.getCaller()->getParent()->getDataLayout();
- // To avoid inserting redundant assumptions, we should check for assumptions
- // already in the caller. To do this, we might need a DT of the caller.
+ // To avoid inserting redundant assumptions, check that an assumption provides
+ // new information in the caller. This might require a dominator tree.
DominatorTree DT;
bool DTCalculated = false;
+ auto calcDomTreeIfNeeded = [&]() {
+ if (!DTCalculated) {
+ DT.recalculate(*CS.getCaller());
+ DTCalculated = true;
+ }
+ };
Function *CalledFunc = CS.getCalledFunction();
+ IRBuilder<> Builder(CS.getInstruction());
for (Argument &Arg : CalledFunc->args()) {
- unsigned Align = Arg.getType()->isPointerTy() ? Arg.getParamAlignment() : 0;
- if (Align && !Arg.hasByValOrInAllocaAttr() && !Arg.hasNUses(0)) {
- if (!DTCalculated) {
- DT.recalculate(*CS.getCaller());
- DTCalculated = true;
- }
+ Value *ArgVal = CS.getArgument(Arg.getArgNo());
+ unsigned Align = Arg.getType()->isPointerTy() ? Arg.getParamAlignment() : 0;
+ if (PreserveAlignmentAssumptions && Align &&
+ !Arg.hasByValOrInAllocaAttr() && !Arg.hasNUses(0)) {
// If we can already prove the asserted alignment in the context of the
// caller, then don't bother inserting the assumption.
- Value *ArgVal = CS.getArgument(Arg.getArgNo());
- if (getKnownAlignment(ArgVal, DL, CS.getInstruction(), AC, &DT) >= Align)
- continue;
+ calcDomTreeIfNeeded();
+ if (getKnownAlignment(ArgVal, DL, CS.getInstruction(), AC, &DT) < Align) {
+ CallInst *Asmp = Builder.CreateAlignmentAssumption(DL, ArgVal, Align);
+ AC->registerAssumption(Asmp);
+ }
+ }
- CallInst *NewAsmp = IRBuilder<>(CS.getInstruction())
- .CreateAlignmentAssumption(DL, ArgVal, Align);
- AC->registerAssumption(NewAsmp);
+ if (Arg.hasNonNullAttr()) {
+ // If we can already prove nonnull in the context of the caller, then
+ // don't bother inserting the assumption.
+ calcDomTreeIfNeeded();
+ if (!isKnownNonNullAt(ArgVal, CS.getInstruction(), &DT)) {
+ Value *NotNull = Builder.CreateIsNotNull(ArgVal);
+ CallInst *Asmp = Builder.CreateAssumption(NotNull);
+ AC->registerAssumption(Asmp);
+ }
}
}
}
@@ -1621,10 +1635,10 @@ bool llvm::InlineFunction(CallSite CS, I
VMap[&*I] = ActualArg;
}
- // Add alignment assumptions if necessary. We do this before the inlined
- // instructions are actually cloned into the caller so that we can easily
- // check what will be known at the start of the inlined code.
- AddAlignmentAssumptions(CS, IFI);
+ // Add assumptions if necessary. We do this before the inlined instructions
+ // are actually cloned into the caller so that we can easily check what will
+ // be known at the start of the inlined code.
+ addAssumptions(CS, IFI);
// We want the inliner to prune the code as it copies. We would LOVE to
// have no dead or constant instructions leftover after inlining occurs
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/arg-attr-propagation.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/arg-attr-propagation.ll?rev=296366&r1=296365&r2=296366&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/arg-attr-propagation.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/arg-attr-propagation.ll Mon Feb 27 12:13:48 2017
@@ -12,11 +12,13 @@ define i32 @callee(i32* dereferenceable(
ret i32 %t2
}
-; FIXME: All dereferenceability information is lost.
+; Add a nonnull assumption.
; The caller argument could be known nonnull and dereferenceable(32).
define i32 @caller1(i32* %t1) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @caller1(i32* %t1)
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = icmp ne i32* %t1, null
+; CHECK-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 [[TMP1]])
; CHECK-NEXT: [[T2_I:%.*]] = load i32, i32* %t1
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[T2_I]]
;
@@ -24,6 +26,7 @@ define i32 @caller1(i32* %t1) {
ret i32 %t2
}
+; Don't add a nonnull assumption if it's redundant.
; The caller argument is nonnull, but that can be explicit.
; The dereferenceable amount could be increased.
@@ -36,6 +39,7 @@ define i32 @caller2(i32* dereferenceable
ret i32 %t2
}
+; Don't add a nonnull assumption if it's redundant.
; The caller argument is nonnull, but that can be explicit.
; Make sure that we don't propagate a smaller dereferenceable amount.
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list