[PATCH] D29240: IR: Consider two DISubprograms to be odr-equal if they have the same template parameters.

[Peter Collingbourne via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

pcc created this revision.

In ValueMapper we create new operands for MDNodes and
rely on MDNode::replaceWithUniqued to create a new MDNode
with the specified operands. However this doesn't always
actually happen correctly for DISubprograms because when we
uniquify the new node, we only odr-compare it with existing nodes
(MDNodeSubsetEqualImpl<DISubprogram>::isDeclarationOfODRMember). Although
the TemplateParameters field can refer to a distinct DICompileUnit via
DITemplateTypeParameter::type -> DICompositeType::scope -> DISubprogram::unit,
it is not currently included in the odr comparison. As a result, we can end
up getting our original DISubprogram back, which means we will have a cloned
module referring to the DICompileUnit in the original module, which causes
a verification error.

The fix I implemented was to consider TemplateParameters to be one of the
odr-equal properties. But I'm a little uncomfortable with this. In general it
seems unsound to rely on distinct MDNodes never being reachable from nodes
which we only check odr-equality of. My only long term suggestion would be
to separate odr-uniquing from full uniquing.

Test case to come.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D29240

Files:
  llvm/lib/IR/LLVMContextImpl.h


Index: llvm/lib/IR/LLVMContextImpl.h
===================================================================
--- llvm/lib/IR/LLVMContextImpl.h
+++ llvm/lib/IR/LLVMContextImpl.h
@@ -612,17 +612,19 @@
   typedef MDNodeKeyImpl<DISubprogram> KeyTy;
   static bool isSubsetEqual(const KeyTy &LHS, const DISubprogram *RHS) {
     return isDeclarationOfODRMember(LHS.IsDefinition, LHS.Scope,
-                                    LHS.LinkageName, RHS);
+                                    LHS.LinkageName, LHS.TemplateParams, RHS);
   }
   static bool isSubsetEqual(const DISubprogram *LHS, const DISubprogram *RHS) {
     return isDeclarationOfODRMember(LHS->isDefinition(), LHS->getRawScope(),
-                                    LHS->getRawLinkageName(), RHS);
+                                    LHS->getRawLinkageName(),
+                                    LHS->getRawTemplateParams(), RHS);
   }
 
   /// Subprograms compare equal if they declare the same function in an ODR
   /// type.
   static bool isDeclarationOfODRMember(bool IsDefinition, const Metadata *Scope,
                                        const MDString *LinkageName,
+                                       const Metadata *TemplateParams,
                                        const DISubprogram *RHS) {
     // Check whether the LHS is eligible.
     if (IsDefinition || !Scope || !LinkageName)
@@ -634,7 +636,8 @@
 
     // Compare to the RHS.
     return IsDefinition == RHS->isDefinition() && Scope == RHS->getRawScope() &&
-           LinkageName == RHS->getRawLinkageName();
+           LinkageName == RHS->getRawLinkageName() &&
+           TemplateParams == RHS->getRawTemplateParams();
   }
 };
 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D29240.86161.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1678 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20170128/1b386cdb/attachment.bin>