[llvm] r293273 - [LICM] When we are recomputing the alias sets for a subloop, we cannot
Chandler Carruth via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jan 27 02:27:33 PST 2017
Author: chandlerc
Date: Fri Jan 27 04:27:32 2017
New Revision: 293273
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=293273&view=rev
Log:
[LICM] When we are recomputing the alias sets for a subloop, we cannot
skip sub-subloops.
The logic to skip subloops dated from when this code was shared with the
cached case. Once it was factored out to only run in the case of
recomputed subloops it became a dangerous bug. If a subsubloop contained
an interfering instruction it would be silently skipped from the alias
sets for LICM.
With the old pass manager this was extremely hard to trigger as it would
require failing to visit these subloops with the LICM pass but then
visiting the outer loop somehow. I've not yet contrived any test case
that actually manages to trigger this.
But with the new pass manager we don't do the cross-loop caching hack
that the old PM does and so we recompute alias set information from
first principles. While this seems much cleaner and simpler it exposed
this bug and would subtly miscompile code due to failing to correctly
model the aliasing constraints of deeply nested loops.
Added:
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/unrolled-deeply-nested.ll
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp?rev=293273&r1=293272&r2=293273&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp Fri Jan 27 04:27:32 2017
@@ -1224,10 +1224,7 @@ LoopInvariantCodeMotion::collectAliasInf
auto mergeLoop = [&](Loop *L) {
// Loop over the body of this loop, looking for calls, invokes, and stores.
- // Because subloops have already been incorporated into AST, we skip blocks
- // in subloops.
for (BasicBlock *BB : L->blocks())
- if (LI->getLoopFor(BB) == L) // Ignore blocks in subloops.
CurAST->add(*BB); // Incorporate the specified basic block
};
Added: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/unrolled-deeply-nested.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/unrolled-deeply-nested.ll?rev=293273&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/unrolled-deeply-nested.ll (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/unrolled-deeply-nested.ll Fri Jan 27 04:27:32 2017
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+; Test that LICM correctly detects conflicting accesses to memory in deeply
+; nested subloops. This works in the legacy PM due to a special retained map of
+; alias information for inner loops, and in the new PM it is recomputed for each
+; loop.
+;
+; RUN: opt -S -aa-pipeline=basic-aa -passes='require<opt-remark-emit>,loop(licm)' < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -S -basicaa -licm < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+define i32 @test(i32* %a, i64 %n.0, i64 %n.0.0, i64 %n.0.0.0, i64 %n.0.0.0.0) nounwind uwtable readonly {
+; CHECK-LABEL: define i32 @test
+entry:
+ %b = alloca i32
+ %c = alloca i32
+ %a.i8 = bitcast i32* %a to i8*
+ %b.i8 = bitcast i32* %b to i8*
+ %c.i8 = bitcast i32* %c to i8*
+ br label %l.0.header
+; CHECK: %b = alloca i32
+; CHECK: %c = alloca i32
+; CHECK: %[[AI8:.*]] = bitcast i32* %a to i8*
+; CHECK: %[[BI8:.*]] = bitcast i32* %b to i8*
+; CHECK: %[[CI8:.*]] = bitcast i32* %c to i8*
+; CHECK-NOT: load
+; CHECK: br
+
+l.0.header:
+ %iv.0 = phi i64 [ %iv.0.next, %l.0.latch ], [ 0, %entry ]
+ %iv.0.next = add i64 %iv.0, 1
+ %exitcond.0 = icmp eq i64 %iv.0.next, %n.0
+ %a.val = load i32, i32* %a
+ store i32 %a.val, i32* %b
+ %c.val = trunc i64 %iv.0 to i32
+ store i32 %c.val, i32* %c
+ br label %l.0.0.header
+; CHECK: %[[AV:.*]] = load i32, i32* %a
+; CHECK: store i32 %[[AV]], i32* %b
+; CHECK: %[[CT:.*]] = trunc i64 {{.*}} to i32
+; CHECK: store i32 %[[CT]], i32* %c
+; CHECK: br
+
+l.0.0.header:
+ %iv.0.0 = phi i64 [ %iv.0.0.next, %l.0.0.latch ], [ 0, %l.0.header ]
+ %iv.0.0.next = add i64 %iv.0.0, 1
+ %exitcond.0.0 = icmp eq i64 %iv.0.0.next, %n.0.0
+ br label %l.0.0.0.header
+; CHECK: br
+
+l.0.0.0.header:
+ %iv.0.0.0 = phi i64 [ %iv.0.0.0.next, %l.0.0.0.header ], [ 0, %l.0.0.header ]
+ %iv.0.0.0.next = add i64 %iv.0.0.0, 1
+ %exitcond.0.0.0 = icmp eq i64 %iv.0.0.0.next, %n.0.0.0
+ call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i64(i8* %a.i8, i8* %c.i8, i64 4, i32 1, i1 false)
+ call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i64(i8* %b.i8, i8* %c.i8, i64 4, i32 1, i1 false)
+ br i1 %exitcond.0.0.0, label %l.0.0.0.header, label %l.0.0.latch
+; CHECK: call void @llvm.memcpy.{{.*}}(i8* %[[AI8]], i8* %[[CI8]], i64 4
+; CHECK: call void @llvm.memcpy.{{.*}}(i8* %[[BI8]], i8* %[[CI8]], i64 4
+; CHECK: br
+
+l.0.0.latch:
+ br i1 %exitcond.0.0, label %l.0.0.header, label %l.0.latch
+; CHECK: br
+
+l.0.latch:
+ %b.val = load i32, i32* %b
+ br i1 %exitcond.0, label %exit, label %l.0.header
+; CHECK: %[[BV:.*]] = load i32, i32* %b
+; CHECK: br
+
+exit:
+ %result.lcssa = phi i32 [ %b.val, %l.0.latch ]
+ ret i32 %b.val
+; CHECK: %[[LCSSA:.*]] = phi i32 [ %[[BV]], %{{.*}} ]
+; CHECK: ret i32 %[[LCSSA]]
+}
+
+declare void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i64(i8* nocapture writeonly, i8* nocapture readonly, i64, i32, i1)
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list