[PATCH] D29203: Change debug-info-for-profiling from a TargetOption to a function attribute.
Paul Robinson via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 26 18:07:09 PST 2017
probinson added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp:1138
+ HasDebugInfoForProfiling=true;
+
// If there's no debug info for the function we're not going to do anything.
----------------
danielcdh wrote:
> mehdi_amini wrote:
> > danielcdh wrote:
> > > mehdi_amini wrote:
> > > > ahatanak wrote:
> > > > > Is debug-info-for-profiling used to turn on and off debug info for profiling on a per-function basis? I'm not very familiar with this function, but it looks like HasDebugInfoForProfiling is initialized to false in the constructor and then it will always be true after beginFunction is called on a function that has attribute debug-info-for-profiling=true.
> > > > Yep that seems broken to me. If foo has the attribute and not bar, we'll emit the profiling debug info for bar if foo is processed first.
> > > The issue is that I cannot check for function's attributes in DwarfUnit::applySubprogramAttributes, any suggestions on how I can pass down this attribute to that function?
> > Why not do here `HasDebugInfoForProfiling = MF->getFunction()->debugInfoForProfiling();` ?
> Because the llvm::DwarfDebug::beginFunction is called first before llvm::DwarfUnit::applySubprogramAttributes are called.
>
> E.g. you have f1, f2, f3
>
> the call sequence is:
> beginFunction(f1)
> beginFunction(f2)
> beginFunction(f3)
> applySubprogramAttributes(subprogramof_f1)
> applySubprogramAttributes(subprogramof_f2)
> applySubprogramAttributes(subprogramof_f3)
>
> The current logic is, if there is any function that has HasDebugInfoForProfiling=true, then all function will have it.
All the more reason to put it at module or CU level, rather than function level.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29203
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list