[PATCH] D28626: RFC: Generalize inverted gc dependencies

[Robert Lytton via llvm-commits]

Yes, the assembler (and linker) use the XCORE_SHF_DP_SECTION and
XCORE_SHF_CP_SECTION values viz 'd' and 'c' are in the ABI for the section.
What would you propose?
Is the usage orthogonal regarding targets?
Robert

________________________________________
From: Rafael Avila de Espindola [rafael.espindola at gmail.com]
Sent: 24 January 2017 17:35
To: Robert Lytton; reviews+D28626+public+0a7e58a8570fa72f at reviews.llvm.org; rnk at google.com; eugenis at google.com; peter at pcc.me.uk; ruiu at google.com
Cc: chisophugis at gmail.com; llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] D28626: RFC: Generalize inverted gc dependencies

Robert Lytton <robert at xmos.com> writes:

> Hi Rafael,
>> Robert, is the MC produced objects used or is another assembler used?
> We don't currently use MC to produce objects.
> (Some work was started and we plan to in the future, but it is unclear when)

And does your current assembler use the XCORE_SHF_DP_SECTION and
XCORE_SHF_CP_SECTION values or we can just fix that in llvm?

Cheers,
Rafael