[PATCH] D28368: Give higher full-unroll boosting when the loop iteration is small.

[Michael Zolotukhin via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

mzolotukhin added a comment.

I agree with the plan proposed by Eli.

One thing I'm not 100% certain is "Rename -unroll-threshold to -unroll-full-threshold": I think we can keep '-unroll-threshold' for full unroll threshold and add '-unroll-partial-threshold' for the partial unrolling case. It might be better because all current uses of '-unroll-threshold' option will remain correct. But I don't feel strong about it, so whatever name you choose is fine with me.

Michael


https://reviews.llvm.org/D28368