[PATCH] D28368: Give higher full-unroll boosting when the loop iteration is small.
Dehao Chen via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jan 17 13:46:36 PST 2017
danielcdh added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D28368#648614, @efriedma wrote:
> It looks like this makes UnrollingPreferences::Threshold essentially unused? We already have a separate threshold for runtime/partial unrolling; it just isn't exposed as a command-line option.
It's still used here:
// Check for explicit Count.
// 1st priority is unroll count set by "unroll-count" option.
bool UserUnrollCount = UnrollCount.getNumOccurrences() > 0;
if (UserUnrollCount) {
UP.Count = UnrollCount;
UP.AllowExpensiveTripCount = true;
UP.Force = true;
if (UP.AllowRemainder && getUnrolledLoopSize(LoopSize, UP) < UP.Threshold)
return true;
}
You are right, partial unroll and runtime unroll uses UP.PartialThreshold which was set the same as UP.Threshold. Any recommendations on how to make this less confusing?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28368
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list