[PATCH] D27901: [X86][[AVX512] Code size reduction in X86 by replacing EVEX with VEX encoding

Gadi Haber via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 20 01:03:35 PST 2016


gadi.haber marked 2 inline comments as done.
gadi.haber added inline comments.


================
Comment at: lib/Target/X86/X86EvexToVex.cpp:105
+  TII = MF.getSubtarget<X86Subtarget>().getInstrInfo();
+  MachineBasicBlock &FirstMBB = MF.front();
+  bool rc = false;
----------------
zvi wrote:
> What if MF is empty?
Added a check:

   if (!MF)
     return false;


================
Comment at: lib/Target/X86/X86EvexToVex.cpp:206
+      
+      if (X86::VR256RegClass.contains(Reg) ||
+          X86::VR128RegClass.contains(Reg))
----------------
craig.topper wrote:
> delena wrote:
> > craig.topper wrote:
> > > gadi.haber wrote:
> > > > craig.topper wrote:
> > > > > Can we use TargetRegisterInfo::getRegEncoding() to simplify this?
> > > > I can simplify the code by defining a lambda function called isAVX512RegOnly(unsigned Reg) and use it to check on the Reg operand to be between X86::ZMM0 and X86::ZMM31 or between X86::YMM16 and X86::YMM31 or between X86:XMM16 and X86::XMM31 as follows:
> > > > 
> > > > auto isAVX512RegOnly = [](unsigned Reg) {
> > > >     if (Reg >= X86::ZMM0 && Reg <= X86::ZMM31)
> > > >         return true;
> > > > 
> > > >     if (Reg >= X86::XMM16 && Reg <= X86::XMM31)
> > > >         return true;
> > > > 
> > > >     if (Reg >= X86::YMM16 && Reg <= X86::YMM31)
> > > >         return true;
> > > > 
> > > >     return false;
> > > >  };
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > Is it even possible to get a VR512 on any of the instructions in the table? The register class is tightly bound to the instruction.
> > > 
> > > For XMM/YMM, getRegEncoding would return 0-31 and you can just check that.
> > I can't find any getRegEncoding() method, do you mean to write a new one?
> Sorry, it's getEncodingValue().
True. There shouldn't be any VR512 registers in the EVEX to VEX tables.
This is an additional safety check.



Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D27901





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list