[llvm] r289988 - [CodeGenPrep] Skip merging empty case blocks
Jun Bum Lim via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Dec 16 12:38:40 PST 2016
Author: junbuml
Date: Fri Dec 16 14:38:39 2016
New Revision: 289988
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=289988&view=rev
Log:
[CodeGenPrep] Skip merging empty case blocks
This is recommit of r287553 after fixing the invalid loop info after eliminating an empty block and unit test failures in AVR and WebAssembly :
Summary: Merging an empty case block into the header block of switch could cause ISel to add COPY instructions in the header of switch, instead of the case block, if the case block is used as an incoming block of a PHI. This could potentially increase dynamic instructions, especially when the switch is in a loop. I added a test case which was reduced from the benchmark I was targetting.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, manmanren, wmi, joerg, davidxl
Subscribers: joerg, qcolombet, danielcdh, hfinkel, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22696
Added:
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/skip-merging-case-block.ll
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AVR/select-must-add-unconditional-jump.ll
llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/WebAssembly/cfg-stackify.ll
llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/phi-immediate-factoring.ll
llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/ragreedy-hoist-spill.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/AArch64/widen_switch.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/X86/widen_switch.ll
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp?rev=289988&r1=289987&r2=289988&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp Fri Dec 16 14:38:39 2016
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
#include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/BlockFrequencyInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ProfileSummaryInfo.h"
@@ -124,6 +126,11 @@ static cl::opt<bool> ProfileGuidedSectio
"profile-guided-section-prefix", cl::Hidden, cl::init(true),
cl::desc("Use profile info to add section prefix for hot/cold functions"));
+static cl::opt<unsigned> FreqRatioToSkipMerge(
+ "cgp-freq-ratio-to-skip-merge", cl::Hidden, cl::init(2),
+ cl::desc("Skip merging empty blocks if (frequency of empty block) / "
+ "(frequency of destination block) is greater than this ratio"));
+
namespace {
typedef SmallPtrSet<Instruction *, 16> SetOfInstrs;
typedef PointerIntPair<Type *, 1, bool> TypeIsSExt;
@@ -136,6 +143,8 @@ class TypePromotionTransaction;
const TargetTransformInfo *TTI;
const TargetLibraryInfo *TLInfo;
const LoopInfo *LI;
+ std::unique_ptr<BlockFrequencyInfo> BFI;
+ std::unique_ptr<BranchProbabilityInfo> BPI;
/// As we scan instructions optimizing them, this is the next instruction
/// to optimize. Transforms that can invalidate this should update it.
@@ -182,8 +191,11 @@ class TypePromotionTransaction;
private:
bool eliminateFallThrough(Function &F);
bool eliminateMostlyEmptyBlocks(Function &F);
+ BasicBlock *findDestBlockOfMergeableEmptyBlock(BasicBlock *BB);
bool canMergeBlocks(const BasicBlock *BB, const BasicBlock *DestBB) const;
void eliminateMostlyEmptyBlock(BasicBlock *BB);
+ bool isMergingEmptyBlockProfitable(BasicBlock *BB, BasicBlock *DestBB,
+ bool isPreheader);
bool optimizeBlock(BasicBlock &BB, bool& ModifiedDT);
bool optimizeInst(Instruction *I, bool& ModifiedDT);
bool optimizeMemoryInst(Instruction *I, Value *Addr,
@@ -230,6 +242,8 @@ bool CodeGenPrepare::runOnFunction(Funct
// Clear per function information.
InsertedInsts.clear();
PromotedInsts.clear();
+ BFI.reset();
+ BPI.reset();
ModifiedDT = false;
if (TM)
@@ -382,6 +396,38 @@ bool CodeGenPrepare::eliminateFallThroug
return Changed;
}
+/// Find a destination block from BB if BB is mergeable empty block.
+BasicBlock *CodeGenPrepare::findDestBlockOfMergeableEmptyBlock(BasicBlock *BB) {
+ // If this block doesn't end with an uncond branch, ignore it.
+ BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(BB->getTerminator());
+ if (!BI || !BI->isUnconditional())
+ return nullptr;
+
+ // If the instruction before the branch (skipping debug info) isn't a phi
+ // node, then other stuff is happening here.
+ BasicBlock::iterator BBI = BI->getIterator();
+ if (BBI != BB->begin()) {
+ --BBI;
+ while (isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(BBI)) {
+ if (BBI == BB->begin())
+ break;
+ --BBI;
+ }
+ if (!isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(BBI) && !isa<PHINode>(BBI))
+ return nullptr;
+ }
+
+ // Do not break infinite loops.
+ BasicBlock *DestBB = BI->getSuccessor(0);
+ if (DestBB == BB)
+ return nullptr;
+
+ if (!canMergeBlocks(BB, DestBB))
+ DestBB = nullptr;
+
+ return DestBB;
+}
+
/// Eliminate blocks that contain only PHI nodes, debug info directives, and an
/// unconditional branch. Passes before isel (e.g. LSR/loopsimplify) often split
/// edges in ways that are non-optimal for isel. Start by eliminating these
@@ -400,46 +446,106 @@ bool CodeGenPrepare::eliminateMostlyEmpt
// Note that this intentionally skips the entry block.
for (Function::iterator I = std::next(F.begin()), E = F.end(); I != E;) {
BasicBlock *BB = &*I++;
+ BasicBlock *DestBB = findDestBlockOfMergeableEmptyBlock(BB);
+ if (!DestBB ||
+ !isMergingEmptyBlockProfitable(BB, DestBB, Preheaders.count(BB)))
+ continue;
- // If this block doesn't end with an uncond branch, ignore it.
- BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(BB->getTerminator());
- if (!BI || !BI->isUnconditional())
+ eliminateMostlyEmptyBlock(BB);
+ MadeChange = true;
+ }
+ return MadeChange;
+}
+
+bool CodeGenPrepare::isMergingEmptyBlockProfitable(BasicBlock *BB,
+ BasicBlock *DestBB,
+ bool isPreheader) {
+ // Do not delete loop preheaders if doing so would create a critical edge.
+ // Loop preheaders can be good locations to spill registers. If the
+ // preheader is deleted and we create a critical edge, registers may be
+ // spilled in the loop body instead.
+ if (!DisablePreheaderProtect && isPreheader &&
+ !(BB->getSinglePredecessor() &&
+ BB->getSinglePredecessor()->getSingleSuccessor()))
+ return false;
+
+ // Try to skip merging if the unique predecessor of BB is terminated by a
+ // switch or indirect branch instruction, and BB is used as an incoming block
+ // of PHIs in DestBB. In such case, merging BB and DestBB would cause ISel to
+ // add COPY instructions in the predecessor of BB instead of BB (if it is not
+ // merged). Note that the critical edge created by merging such blocks wont be
+ // split in MachineSink because the jump table is not analyzable. By keeping
+ // such empty block (BB), ISel will place COPY instructions in BB, not in the
+ // predecessor of BB.
+ BasicBlock *Pred = BB->getUniquePredecessor();
+ if (!Pred ||
+ !(isa<SwitchInst>(Pred->getTerminator()) ||
+ isa<IndirectBrInst>(Pred->getTerminator())))
+ return true;
+
+ if (BB->getTerminator() != BB->getFirstNonPHI())
+ return true;
+
+ // We use a simple cost heuristic which determine skipping merging is
+ // profitable if the cost of skipping merging is less than the cost of
+ // merging : Cost(skipping merging) < Cost(merging BB), where the
+ // Cost(skipping merging) is Freq(BB) * (Cost(Copy) + Cost(Branch)), and
+ // the Cost(merging BB) is Freq(Pred) * Cost(Copy).
+ // Assuming Cost(Copy) == Cost(Branch), we could simplify it to :
+ // Freq(Pred) / Freq(BB) > 2.
+ // Note that if there are multiple empty blocks sharing the same incoming
+ // value for the PHIs in the DestBB, we consider them together. In such
+ // case, Cost(merging BB) will be the sum of their frequencies.
+
+ if (!isa<PHINode>(DestBB->begin()))
+ return true;
+
+ SmallPtrSet<BasicBlock *, 16> SameIncomingValueBBs;
+
+ // Find all other incoming blocks from which incoming values of all PHIs in
+ // DestBB are the same as the ones from BB.
+ for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(DestBB), E = pred_end(DestBB); PI != E;
+ ++PI) {
+ BasicBlock *DestBBPred = *PI;
+ if (DestBBPred == BB)
continue;
- // If the instruction before the branch (skipping debug info) isn't a phi
- // node, then other stuff is happening here.
- BasicBlock::iterator BBI = BI->getIterator();
- if (BBI != BB->begin()) {
- --BBI;
- while (isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(BBI)) {
- if (BBI == BB->begin())
- break;
- --BBI;
+ bool HasAllSameValue = true;
+ BasicBlock::const_iterator DestBBI = DestBB->begin();
+ while (const PHINode *DestPN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(DestBBI++)) {
+ if (DestPN->getIncomingValueForBlock(BB) !=
+ DestPN->getIncomingValueForBlock(DestBBPred)) {
+ HasAllSameValue = false;
+ break;
}
- if (!isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(BBI) && !isa<PHINode>(BBI))
- continue;
}
+ if (HasAllSameValue)
+ SameIncomingValueBBs.insert(DestBBPred);
+ }
- // Do not break infinite loops.
- BasicBlock *DestBB = BI->getSuccessor(0);
- if (DestBB == BB)
- continue;
+ // See if all BB's incoming values are same as the value from Pred. In this
+ // case, no reason to skip merging because COPYs are expected to be place in
+ // Pred already.
+ if (SameIncomingValueBBs.count(Pred))
+ return true;
+
+ if (!BFI) {
+ Function &F = *BB->getParent();
+ LoopInfo LI{DominatorTree(F)};
+ BPI.reset(new BranchProbabilityInfo(F, LI));
+ BFI.reset(new BlockFrequencyInfo(F, *BPI, LI));
+ }
- if (!canMergeBlocks(BB, DestBB))
- continue;
+ BlockFrequency PredFreq = BFI->getBlockFreq(Pred);
+ BlockFrequency BBFreq = BFI->getBlockFreq(BB);
- // Do not delete loop preheaders if doing so would create a critical edge.
- // Loop preheaders can be good locations to spill registers. If the
- // preheader is deleted and we create a critical edge, registers may be
- // spilled in the loop body instead.
- if (!DisablePreheaderProtect && Preheaders.count(BB) &&
- !(BB->getSinglePredecessor() && BB->getSinglePredecessor()->getSingleSuccessor()))
- continue;
+ for (auto SameValueBB : SameIncomingValueBBs)
+ if (SameValueBB->getUniquePredecessor() == Pred &&
+ DestBB == findDestBlockOfMergeableEmptyBlock(SameValueBB))
+ BBFreq += BFI->getBlockFreq(SameValueBB);
- eliminateMostlyEmptyBlock(BB);
- MadeChange = true;
- }
- return MadeChange;
+ return PredFreq.getFrequency() <=
+ BBFreq.getFrequency() * FreqRatioToSkipMerge;
}
/// Return true if we can merge BB into DestBB if there is a single
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AVR/select-must-add-unconditional-jump.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AVR/select-must-add-unconditional-jump.ll?rev=289988&r1=289987&r2=289988&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AVR/select-must-add-unconditional-jump.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AVR/select-must-add-unconditional-jump.ll Fri Dec 16 14:38:39 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: llc -march=avr -print-after=expand-isel-pseudos < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc -march=avr -print-after=expand-isel-pseudos -cgp-freq-ratio-to-skip-merge=10 < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; Because `switch` seems to trigger Machine Basic Blocks to be ordered
; in a different order than they were constructed, this exposes an
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/WebAssembly/cfg-stackify.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/WebAssembly/cfg-stackify.ll?rev=289988&r1=289987&r2=289988&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/WebAssembly/cfg-stackify.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/WebAssembly/cfg-stackify.ll Fri Dec 16 14:38:39 2016
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-; RUN: llc < %s -asm-verbose=false -disable-wasm-fallthrough-return-opt -disable-block-placement -verify-machineinstrs -fast-isel=false -machine-sink-split-probability-threshold=0 | FileCheck %s
-; RUN: llc < %s -asm-verbose=false -disable-wasm-fallthrough-return-opt -tail-dup-placement=0 -verify-machineinstrs -fast-isel=false -machine-sink-split-probability-threshold=0 | FileCheck -check-prefix=OPT %s
+; RUN: llc < %s -asm-verbose=false -disable-wasm-fallthrough-return-opt -disable-block-placement -verify-machineinstrs -fast-isel=false -machine-sink-split-probability-threshold=0 -cgp-freq-ratio-to-skip-merge=1000 | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc < %s -asm-verbose=false -disable-wasm-fallthrough-return-opt -tail-dup-placement=0 -verify-machineinstrs -fast-isel=false -machine-sink-split-probability-threshold=0 -cgp-freq-ratio-to-skip-merge=1000 | FileCheck -check-prefix=OPT %s
; Test the CFG stackifier pass.
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/phi-immediate-factoring.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/phi-immediate-factoring.ll?rev=289988&r1=289987&r2=289988&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/phi-immediate-factoring.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/phi-immediate-factoring.ll Fri Dec 16 14:38:39 2016
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
; REQUIRES: asserts
-; RUN: llc < %s -disable-preheader-prot=true -march=x86 -stats 2>&1 | grep "Number of blocks eliminated" | grep 6
+; RUN: llc < %s -disable-preheader-prot=true -march=x86 -stats 2>&1 | grep "Number of blocks eliminated" | grep 3
+; RUN: llc < %s -disable-preheader-prot=true -march=x86 -stats -cgp-freq-ratio-to-skip-merge=10 2>&1 | grep "Number of blocks eliminated" | grep 6
; RUN: llc < %s -disable-preheader-prot=false -march=x86 -stats 2>&1 | grep "Number of blocks eliminated" | grep 3
; PR1296
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/ragreedy-hoist-spill.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/ragreedy-hoist-spill.ll?rev=289988&r1=289987&r2=289988&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/ragreedy-hoist-spill.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/ragreedy-hoist-spill.ll Fri Dec 16 14:38:39 2016
@@ -177,14 +177,14 @@ for.cond357:
br label %for.cond357
sw.bb474:
+ ; CHECK: sw.bb474
+ ; spill is hoisted here. Although loop depth1 is even hotter than loop depth2, sw.bb474 is still cold.
+ ; CHECK: movq %r{{.*}}, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp)
+ ; CHECK: land.rhs485
%cmp476 = icmp eq i8 undef, 0
br i1 %cmp476, label %if.end517, label %do.body479.preheader
do.body479.preheader:
- ; CHECK: do.body479.preheader
- ; spill is hoisted here. Although loop depth1 is even hotter than loop depth2, do.body479.preheader is cold.
- ; CHECK: movq %r{{.*}}, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp)
- ; CHECK: land.rhs485
%cmp4833314 = icmp eq i8 undef, 0
br i1 %cmp4833314, label %if.end517, label %land.rhs485
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/AArch64/widen_switch.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/AArch64/widen_switch.ll?rev=289988&r1=289987&r2=289988&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/AArch64/widen_switch.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/AArch64/widen_switch.ll Fri Dec 16 14:38:39 2016
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ return:
; ARM64-LABEL: @widen_switch_i16(
; ARM64: %0 = zext i16 %trunc to i32
; ARM64-NEXT: switch i32 %0, label %sw.default [
-; ARM64-NEXT: i32 1, label %return
+; ARM64-NEXT: i32 1, label %sw.bb0
; ARM64-NEXT: i32 65535, label %sw.bb1
}
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ return:
; ARM64-LABEL: @widen_switch_i17(
; ARM64: %0 = zext i17 %trunc to i32
; ARM64-NEXT: switch i32 %0, label %sw.default [
-; ARM64-NEXT: i32 10, label %return
+; ARM64-NEXT: i32 10, label %sw.bb0
; ARM64-NEXT: i32 131071, label %sw.bb1
}
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ return:
; ARM64-LABEL: @widen_switch_i16_sext(
; ARM64: %0 = sext i2 %a to i32
; ARM64-NEXT: switch i32 %0, label %sw.default [
-; ARM64-NEXT: i32 1, label %return
+; ARM64-NEXT: i32 1, label %sw.bb0
; ARM64-NEXT: i32 -1, label %sw.bb1
}
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/X86/widen_switch.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/X86/widen_switch.ll?rev=289988&r1=289987&r2=289988&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/X86/widen_switch.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/X86/widen_switch.ll Fri Dec 16 14:38:39 2016
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ return:
; X86-LABEL: @widen_switch_i16(
; X86: %trunc = trunc i32 %a to i16
; X86-NEXT: switch i16 %trunc, label %sw.default [
-; X86-NEXT: i16 1, label %return
+; X86-NEXT: i16 1, label %sw.bb0
; X86-NEXT: i16 -1, label %sw.bb1
}
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ return:
; X86-LABEL: @widen_switch_i17(
; X86: %0 = zext i17 %trunc to i32
; X86-NEXT: switch i32 %0, label %sw.default [
-; X86-NEXT: i32 10, label %return
+; X86-NEXT: i32 10, label %sw.bb0
; X86-NEXT: i32 131071, label %sw.bb1
}
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ return:
; X86-LABEL: @widen_switch_i16_sext(
; X86: %0 = sext i2 %a to i8
; X86-NEXT: switch i8 %0, label %sw.default [
-; X86-NEXT: i8 1, label %return
+; X86-NEXT: i8 1, label %sw.bb0
; X86-NEXT: i8 -1, label %sw.bb1
}
Added: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/skip-merging-case-block.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/skip-merging-case-block.ll?rev=289988&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/skip-merging-case-block.ll (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/skip-merging-case-block.ll Fri Dec 16 14:38:39 2016
@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
+; RUN: opt -codegenprepare < %s -mtriple=aarch64-none-linux-gnu -S | FileCheck %s
+
+target datalayout = "e-m:e-i8:8:32-i16:16:32-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128"
+target triple = "aarch64--linux-gnu"
+
+; Expect to skip merging two empty blocks (sw.bb and sw.bb2) into sw.epilog
+; as both of them are unlikely executed.
+define i32 @f_switch(i32 %c) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @f_switch
+; CHECK-LABEL: entry:
+; CHECK: i32 10, label %sw.bb
+; CHECK: i32 20, label %sw.bb2
+entry:
+ switch i32 %c, label %sw.default [
+ i32 10, label %sw.bb
+ i32 20, label %sw.bb2
+ i32 30, label %sw.bb3
+ i32 40, label %sw.bb4
+ ], !prof !0
+
+sw.bb: ; preds = %entry
+ br label %sw.epilog
+
+sw.bb2: ; preds = %entry
+ br label %sw.epilog
+
+sw.bb3: ; preds = %entry
+ call void bitcast (void (...)* @callcase3 to void ()*)()
+ br label %sw.epilog
+
+sw.bb4: ; preds = %entry
+ call void bitcast (void (...)* @callcase4 to void ()*)()
+ br label %sw.epilog
+
+sw.default: ; preds = %entry
+ call void bitcast (void (...)* @calldefault to void ()*)()
+ br label %sw.epilog
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: sw.epilog:
+; CHECK: %fp.0 = phi void (...)* [ @FD, %sw.default ], [ @F4, %sw.bb4 ], [ @F3, %sw.bb3 ], [ @F2, %sw.bb2 ], [ @F1, %sw.bb ]
+sw.epilog: ; preds = %sw.default, %sw.bb3, %sw.bb2, %sw.bb
+ %fp.0 = phi void (...)* [ @FD, %sw.default ], [ @F4, %sw.bb4 ], [ @F3, %sw.bb3 ], [ @F2, %sw.bb2 ], [ @F1, %sw.bb ]
+ %callee.knr.cast = bitcast void (...)* %fp.0 to void ()*
+ call void %callee.knr.cast()
+ ret i32 0
+}
+
+; Expect not to merge sw.bb2 because of the conflict in the incoming value from
+; sw.bb which is already merged.
+define i32 @f_switch2(i32 %c) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @f_switch2
+; CHECK-LABEL: entry:
+; CHECK: i32 10, label %sw.epilog
+; CHECK: i32 20, label %sw.bb2
+entry:
+ switch i32 %c, label %sw.default [
+ i32 10, label %sw.bb
+ i32 20, label %sw.bb2
+ i32 30, label %sw.bb3
+ i32 40, label %sw.bb4
+ ], !prof !1
+
+sw.bb: ; preds = %entry
+ br label %sw.epilog
+
+sw.bb2: ; preds = %entry
+ br label %sw.epilog
+
+sw.bb3: ; preds = %entry
+ call void bitcast (void (...)* @callcase3 to void ()*)()
+ br label %sw.epilog
+
+sw.bb4: ; preds = %entry
+ call void bitcast (void (...)* @callcase4 to void ()*)()
+ br label %sw.epilog
+
+sw.default: ; preds = %entry
+ call void bitcast (void (...)* @calldefault to void ()*)()
+ br label %sw.epilog
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: sw.epilog:
+; CHECK: %fp.0 = phi void (...)* [ @FD, %sw.default ], [ @F4, %sw.bb4 ], [ @F3, %sw.bb3 ], [ @F2, %sw.bb2 ], [ @F1, %entry ]
+sw.epilog: ; preds = %sw.default, %sw.bb3, %sw.bb2, %sw.bb
+ %fp.0 = phi void (...)* [ @FD, %sw.default ], [ @F4, %sw.bb4 ], [ @F3, %sw.bb3 ], [ @F2, %sw.bb2 ], [ @F1, %sw.bb ]
+ %callee.knr.cast = bitcast void (...)* %fp.0 to void ()*
+ call void %callee.knr.cast()
+ ret i32 0
+}
+
+; Multiple empty blocks should be considered together if all incoming values
+; from them are same. We expect to merge both empty blocks (sw.bb and sw.bb2)
+; because the sum of frequencies are higer than the threshold.
+define i32 @f_switch3(i32 %c) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @f_switch3
+; CHECK-LABEL: entry:
+; CHECK: i32 10, label %sw.epilog
+; CHECK: i32 20, label %sw.epilog
+entry:
+ switch i32 %c, label %sw.default [
+ i32 10, label %sw.bb
+ i32 20, label %sw.bb2
+ i32 30, label %sw.bb3
+ i32 40, label %sw.bb4
+ ], !prof !2
+
+sw.bb: ; preds = %entry
+ br label %sw.epilog
+
+sw.bb2: ; preds = %entry
+ br label %sw.epilog
+
+sw.bb3: ; preds = %entry
+ call void bitcast (void (...)* @callcase3 to void ()*)()
+ br label %sw.epilog
+
+sw.bb4: ; preds = %entry
+ call void bitcast (void (...)* @callcase4 to void ()*)()
+ br label %sw.epilog
+
+sw.default: ; preds = %entry
+ call void bitcast (void (...)* @calldefault to void ()*)()
+ br label %sw.epilog
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: sw.epilog:
+; CHECK: %fp.0 = phi void (...)* [ @FD, %sw.default ], [ @F4, %sw.bb4 ], [ @F3, %sw.bb3 ], [ @F1, %entry ], [ @F1, %entry ]
+sw.epilog: ; preds = %sw.default, %sw.bb3, %sw.bb2, %sw.bb
+ %fp.0 = phi void (...)* [ @FD, %sw.default ], [ @F4, %sw.bb4 ], [ @F3, %sw.bb3 ], [ @F1, %sw.bb2 ], [ @F1, %sw.bb ]
+ %callee.knr.cast = bitcast void (...)* %fp.0 to void ()*
+ call void %callee.knr.cast()
+ ret i32 0
+}
+
+declare void @F1(...) local_unnamed_addr
+declare void @F2(...) local_unnamed_addr
+declare void @F3(...) local_unnamed_addr
+declare void @F4(...) local_unnamed_addr
+declare void @FD(...) local_unnamed_addr
+declare void @callcase3(...) local_unnamed_addr
+declare void @callcase4(...) local_unnamed_addr
+declare void @calldefault(...) local_unnamed_addr
+
+!0 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 5, i32 1, i32 1,i32 5, i32 5}
+!1 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 1 , i32 5, i32 1,i32 1, i32 1}
+!2 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 1 , i32 4, i32 1,i32 1, i32 1}
+
+
+; This test that BFI/BPI is created without any assertion in isMergingEmptyBlockProfitable()
+; in the case where empty blocks are removed before creating BFI/BPI.
+ at b = common global i32 0, align 4
+ at a = common global i32* null, align 8
+define i32 @should_not_assert(i32 %i) local_unnamed_addr {
+entry:
+ %0 = load i32, i32* @b, align 4
+ %cond = icmp eq i32 %0, 6
+ br i1 %cond, label %while.cond.preheader, label %sw.epilog
+
+while.cond.preheader: ; preds = %entry
+ %1 = load i32*, i32** @a, align 8
+ %magicptr = ptrtoint i32* %1 to i64
+ %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %1, i64 1
+ br label %while.cond
+
+while.cond: ; preds = %while.cond.preheader, %land.rhs
+ switch i64 %magicptr, label %land.rhs [
+ i64 32, label %while.cond2.loopexit
+ i64 0, label %while.cond2.loopexit
+ ]
+
+land.rhs: ; preds = %while.cond
+ %2 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
+ %tobool1 = icmp eq i32 %2, 0
+ br i1 %tobool1, label %while.cond2thread-pre-split.loopexit, label %while.cond
+
+while.cond2thread-pre-split.loopexit: ; preds = %land.rhs
+ br label %while.cond2thread-pre-split
+
+while.cond2thread-pre-split: ; preds = %while.cond2thread-pre-split.loopexit, %while.body4
+ %.pr = phi i32* [ %.pr.pre, %while.body4 ], [ %1, %while.cond2thread-pre-split.loopexit ]
+ br label %while.cond2
+
+while.cond2.loopexit: ; preds = %while.cond, %while.cond
+ br label %while.cond2
+
+while.cond2: ; preds = %while.cond2.loopexit, %while.cond2thread-pre-split
+ %3 = phi i32* [ %.pr, %while.cond2thread-pre-split ], [ %1, %while.cond2.loopexit ]
+ %tobool3 = icmp eq i32* %3, null
+ br i1 %tobool3, label %sw.epilog, label %while.body4
+
+while.body4: ; preds = %while.cond2
+ tail call void bitcast (void (...)* @fn2 to void ()*)()
+ %.pr.pre = load i32*, i32** @a, align 8
+ br label %while.cond2thread-pre-split
+
+sw.epilog: ; preds = %while.cond2, %entry
+ ret i32 undef
+}
+
+
+declare void @fn2(...) local_unnamed_addr
+
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list