[PATCH] D27603: Propagate -fdiagnostics-color to LLD.
Rui Ueyama via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Dec 9 11:01:59 PST 2016
ruiu added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Driver/Tools.cpp:284
+ // propagate -fdiagnostics-color.
+ if (StringRef(TC.GetLinkerPath()).endswith("ld.lld") &&
+ D.getDiags().getShowColors())
----------------
rsmith wrote:
> I don't think this will work for `-fuse-ld=$BINDIR/lld` and the like. We also have code around Tools.cpp doing things like this:
>
> const char *Exec = Args.MakeArgString(ToolChain.GetLinkerPath());
> if (llvm::sys::path::filename(Exec) == "lld") {
>
> and
>
> const char *Exec = Args.MakeArgString(ToolChain.GetLinkerPath());
> if (llvm::sys::path::stem(Exec).equals_lower("lld")) {
>
> so detecting `ld.lld` here seems inconsistent. (Meanwhile, the above checks won't fire for `-fuse-ld=lld`, since that sets the linker path to .../ld.lld.)
>
> I think it's time to factor out an `isLinkerLLD` function and use that to detect whether we're using lld.
What if a linker is just `/usr/bin/ld`? I want to detect if it's LLD or not, but it's not doable without running that command. (If we pass it via the environment, we can always set LLD_COLOR_DIAGNOSTICS=1 though.)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27603
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list