[PATCH] D26429: [LSR] Allow formula containing Reg for SCEVAddRecExpr with loop other than current loop
Quentin Colombet via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Nov 10 14:59:53 PST 2016
qcolombet added a comment.
Hi Wei,
Looks mostly good to me.
Couple of comments regarding the test case.
Cheers,
-Quentin
================
Comment at: test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/nested-loop.ll:2
+; RUN: opt -loop-reduce -disable-output -debug-only=loop-reduce < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+; REQUIRES: asserts
+
----------------
Could you add a comment on what this loop is supposed to check?
I believe we want to stress that the relevant bit is the use of outer loop IV in inner loop.
================
Comment at: test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/nested-loop.ll:2
+; RUN: opt -loop-reduce -disable-output -debug-only=loop-reduce < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+; REQUIRES: asserts
+
----------------
qcolombet wrote:
> Could you add a comment on what this loop is supposed to check?
> I believe we want to stress that the relevant bit is the use of outer loop IV in inner loop.
Instead of parsing the debug output, could you expose a test case that takes advantage of the newly kept formulae?
Basically, I am asking for check lines over the IR, not the debug output.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26429
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list