D26399: [ELF] - Implemented -stats command line option.

George Rimar via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Nov 8 23:22:13 PST 2016


>davide added a comment.
>
>ehm, do you know what they use this for? It's supposed to be a debug only options, it shouldn't ship in any release.

No, I don't know. But that definetely is a reason of fail for me:

linking ../lib/libtinfo.so.6.0
cc -O2 -pipe  -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing  --param max-inline-insns-single=1200 -shared -Wl,-soname,`basename ../lib/libtinfo.so.6.0 .6.0`.6,-stats,-lc -o ../lib/libtinfo.so.6.0 -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib ../obj_s/access.o  ../obj_s/add_tries.o  ../obj_s/alloc_ttype.o  ../obj_s/codes.o  ../obj_s/comp_captab.o  ../obj_s/comp_error.o  ../obj_s/comp_hash.o  ../obj_s/db_iterator.o  ../obj_s/doalloc.o  ../obj_s/entries.o  ../obj_s/fallback.o  ../obj_s/free_ttype.o  ../obj_s/getenv_num.o  ../obj_s/home_terminfo.o  ../obj_s/init_keytry.o  ../obj_s/lib_acs.o  ../obj_s/lib_baudrate.o  ../obj_s/lib_cur_term.o  ../obj_s/lib_data.o  ../obj_s/lib_has_cap.o  ../obj_s/lib_kernel.o  ../obj_s/lib_keyname.o  ../obj_s/lib_longname.o  ../obj_s/lib_napms.o  ../obj_s/lib_options.o  ../obj_s/lib_raw.o  ../obj_s/lib_setup.o  ../obj_s/lib_termcap.o  ../obj_s/lib_termname.o  ../obj_s/lib_tgoto.o  ../obj_s/lib_ti.o  ../obj_s/lib_tparm.o  ../obj_s/lib_tputs.o  ../obj_s/lib_trace.o  ../obj_s/lib_ttyflags.o  ../obj_s/lib_twait.o  ../obj_s/name_match.o  ../obj_s/names.o  ../obj_s/obsolete.o  ../obj_s/read_entry.o  ../obj_s/read_termcap.o  ../obj_s/strings.o  ../obj_s/tries.o  ../obj_s/trim_sgr0.o  ../obj_s/unctrl.o  ../obj_s/visbuf.o  ../obj_s/alloc_entry.o  ../obj_s/captoinfo.o  ../obj_s/comp_expand.o  ../obj_s/comp_parse.o  ../obj_s/comp_scan.o  ../obj_s/parse_entry.o  ../obj_s/write_entry.o  ../obj_s/define_key.o  ../obj_s/hashed_db.o  ../obj_s/key_defined.o  ../obj_s/keybound.o  ../obj_s/keyok.o  ../obj_s/version.o -L../lib -fstack-protector
/usr/bin/ld: error: unknown argument: -stats

So if we do not want to implement something under -stats, we can try to ignore that flag and retest.

Best regards,
George.





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list