[PATCH] D26255: [cmake] Rename HAVE_DIA_SDK to LLVM_ENABLE_DIA_SDK, and expose in LLVMConfig
Zachary Turner via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 7 13:51:53 PST 2016
Actually LLDB does use DIA. SymbolFilePDB enables simple symbolization of
programs built with PDB debug info support on Windows and uses DIA to
accomplish this.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:48 PM Michał Górny <mgorny at gentoo.org> wrote:
> mgorny added a comment.
>
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26255#588591, @beanz wrote:
>
> > I think you're conflating two different types of variables, and I don't
> understand why.
> >
> > `LLVM_ENABLE_*` variables are intended to be used for people to opt in
> or out of functionality. `HAVE_*` variables are for compiler checks against
> the system capabilities. Generally system capabilities shouldn't be
> captured in LLVM installed bits, which is what you're doing here.
>
>
> I was considering this issue, and I've decided having user control over
> DIA SDK a worthwhile future effort. While this patch doesn't add it, it
> prepares the stuff to use it when it's added.
>
> > I think the correct solution would be for you to perform the
> `HAVE_DIA_SDK` check in LLDB as well as LLVM. If the code is sufficiently
> complex, the LLVM version of the code could be abstracted into a module and
> re-used.
>
> DIA support enables some PDB debug format support in LLVM, that is
> unavailable otherwise. LLDB doesn't use DIA at all but the PDB tests
> require DIA support enabled during LLVM build. In this regard, it's similar
> to zlib support, upon which I based my patch.
>
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D26255
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20161107/89461259/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list