[PATCH] D26130: [ELF] - Implemented --symbol-ordering-file option.
Davide Italiano via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 7 10:54:45 PST 2016
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:47 AM, George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote:
> grimar added a comment.
>
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26130#587774, @davide wrote:
>
>> If lld mislinks firefox, we shouldn't silently ignore it and try to link with gold, but open a bug instead (and/or try to fix).
>
>
> I think it is just an issue of their build system.
> I found similar issues: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1080654, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1063359
>
> widget/gtk/mozgtk/gtk3/moz.build has next lines:
>
> if CONFIG['GCC_USE_GNU_LD']:
> no_as_needed = ['-Wl,--no-as-needed1']
> as_needed = ['-Wl,--as-needed']
> else:
> no_as_needed = []
> as_needed = []
>
> If I change the last two to have -Wl..., then build works fine for me.
>
Oh, this means we just need another special case for lld in their
build system. I'll try to submit a patch to them when I have time.
>
>
> ================
> Comment at: test/ELF/symbol-ordering-file.s:9
> +# BEFORE: Contents of section .text:
> +# BEFORE-NEXT: 11000 11223344 55
> +
> ----------------
> davide wrote:
>> grimar wrote:
>> > rafael wrote:
>> > > Changing .text to .foo should make this easier to read as .foo doesn't have an implicit alignment.
>> > linker does not concatinate .foo into single section like .text.* :(
>> > So I had to use .text
>> Can't you just use multiple input files with two `.foo` sections?
> I think reasonable minimum to show that sorting is performed according to order file is
> at least 3 sections. So that would be main test file + 2 input files.
>
> I find testcases that use additional inputs harder to read generally, so actually I would prefer current way
> when testcase is just a two files in total.
> My test has 5 sections what also allows to check spaces before/after symbol in ordering file,
> doing that with .foo and multiple inputs would require 4 input files I think.
>
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D26130
>
>
>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list