[PATCH] D17260: SystemZ scheduling implementation

[Andrew Trick via llvm-commits]

atrick added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D17260#572785, @jonpa wrote:

>




> Does anyone know how to say "Instruction B should have the same scheduling class as instruction A" ? This was the only point I could not get fixed.

I'm not sure I understand the problem. I *think* you can mark your scheduling model "complete", then add InstAlias records in your .td file without adding new InstRW records...


https://reviews.llvm.org/D17260