[PATCH] D25379: ThinLTO: don't perform incremental LTO on module without a hash

[Teresa Johnson via llvm-commits]

tejohnson added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D25379#565109, @mehdi_amini wrote:

> It is conceptually independent and could go in now, but yes I'll wait for the other one so that I don't have to fix the conflict.


I don't have the other approach started yet, and this is needed to be able to fix the bug fixed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D25300.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D25379