[PATCH] D24167: Moving to GitHub - Unified Proposal

[Mehdi AMINI via llvm-commits]

mehdi_amini marked 45 inline comments as done.
mehdi_amini added inline comments.


> beanz wrote in GitHubMove.rst:249
> From the beginning I said:
> 
> > It won't be perfect, but it should be good enough for sorting commits in close proximity...
> 
> If you want to debate that statement we can do so, but I would prefer not to in this thread.
> 
> > Also you're changing the definition of the multi-repo as I was foreseeing it. I think it is worse, and if we were to adopt the multi-repo proposal, I would be totally against this.
> 
> You don't get to dictate how the proposal in opposition to your preferred approach is written. I think you've been pretty clear about being against the multi-repo proposal, so I don't see how your opinion factors in to the final document, which shouldn't be opinion based.

> You don't get to dictate how ...

Sorry, you mischaracterizing my position and what I wrote, I don't appreciate this.

> jlebar wrote in GitHubMove.rst:355
> I really think you want this paragraph, btw.  This is a very common question -- it's been asked many times before.  "I don't want the monorepo because it will mean I have to rebuild/retest a *lot* more than I do today."  False, but we need to explain why.

OK, I'll try to rephrase it then.
The main point is that `git pull && git push` is not different from today SVN.

https://reviews.llvm.org/D24167