[lld] r282118 - Once more unto the strict weak ordering, once more.

[Rafael Espíndola via llvm-commits]

On 22 September 2016 at 04:44, Eugene Leviant <evgeny.leviant at gmail.com> wrote:
> This breaks things for me (I'm getting extra PT_LOAD, because RO
> orphans are placed in the beginning of the section list), so I wonder
> why don't you simply put RO orphans after RO sections, RW after RW and
> so on?
>

Do you have an example? Normally RO sections are the start, so moving
other RO sections there should not be a problem.

We could put orphans further down the file, but one case to be careful about is

foo : { *(foo) }
. = align...
bar : { *(bar) }

with foo RO and bar RW. If a ro section zed is pushed after the
alignment it will cause the PT_LOAD that starts at bar to be
unaligned.


Cheers,
Rafael