[PATCH] D23965: Add StringRef::keep_front() and StringRef::keep_back()

[Zachary Turner via llvm-commits]

Does anyone have a tie breaker? I'd like to het this in today if possible
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:22 PM Adrian McCarthy <amccarth at google.com> wrote:

> amccarth added a comment.
>
> I'm torn on the naming debate.  I think `take_back` is awkward, and using
> `first` and `last` instead of `front` and `back` would make the new names
> inconsistent with `drop_front` and `drop_back` (and with STL container
> naming).  I also see that point that `keep` is less precise.
>
> Everything else LGTM.
>
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D23965
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20160830/e50edc36/attachment.html>