[llvm] r279573 - MachineFunction: Introduce NoPHIs property

Kostya Serebryany via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 24 20:56:18 PDT 2016


err, no, scratch that, probably just a flake.

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:

> this failure may also be related:
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-ppc64be-
> linux/builds/3510/steps/run%20msan%20unit%20tests/logs/stdio
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I afraid I may need some help now...
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux-lnt/
>> builds/7075/steps/ninja%20check%201/logs/FAIL%3A%20AddressSa
>> nitizer-Unit%3A%3AAddressSanitizerInterface.ManyThreadsWithS
>> tatsStressTest
>>
>> [ RUN      ] AddressSanitizerInterface.ManyThreadsWithStatsStressTest
>> ==18839==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-lnt-test/clang-ppc64be-lnt/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_allocator.cc:484 "((m->free_tid)) == ((kInvalidTid))" (0x65, 0xffffff)
>>     #0 0x10102680  (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-lnt-test/clang-ppc64be-lnt/stage1/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/tests/default/Asan-powerpc64-inline-Test+0x10102680)
>>     #1 0x10123754  (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-lnt-test/clang-ppc64be-lnt/stage1/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/tests/default/Asan-powerpc64-inline-Test+0x10123754)
>>
>>
>>
>> This is most likely due to  r279664, so please verify that by reverting
>> it locally.
>>
>> next, do you know why the stack traces on the bot are not symbolized?
>> is that because llvm-symbolizer is not supported on PPC?
>> I need the symbolized stack traces to get some clue...
>>
>> finally, will you be able to make the test smaller to narrow down the
>> cause of the failure?
>>
>> If this is the only failure due to r279664 I'd rather disable this test
>> on PPC than revert r279664.
>> WDYT?
>>
>> --kcc
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Bill Seurer <seurer at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/24/16 13:22, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
>>>
>>>> Did reverting help?
>>>> If yes, I will need someone's help to debug this on PPC -- I really need
>>>> this change back.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Reverting it did help.  In the future if you (or anyone else) needs help
>>> with debugging a problem on power I can usually help.  Just let me know
>>> what you need done.
>>> --
>>>
>>> -Bill Seurer
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20160824/521b3b01/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list