[PATCH] D22726: [DAGCombine] Match shift amount by value rather than relying on common sub-expressions.

[bryant via llvm-commits]

bryant added a comment.

No. There are earlier combine rules that match specifically match on `iN, N > 64` that distort the `(shl (srl x, c), c)` pattern.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D22726