[PATCH] D21723: [RFC] Enhance synchscope representation

[Mehdi AMINI via llvm-commits]

mehdi_amini added a comment.

I mentioned it earlier in this revision (as well as in the email thread in the description of this current patch), and I haven't seen this addressed anywhere.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D21723#495409, @mehdi_amini wrote:

> Unanswered quote from the thread linker in the description: "It seems you’re going back to integer, which I don’t really like for reasons mentioned earlier in this thread, and that I don’t feel you addressed here."





https://reviews.llvm.org/D21723