[PATCH] D23404: Remove suggestion to use "#if 0" ... "#endif" for large blocks of comments
Andrey Bokhanko via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 12 03:20:43 PDT 2016
andreybokhanko added a comment.
@lattner, thank you for the quick review -- I hoped / feared for more discussion! :-)
To clarify, my reading of this paragraph (written in "Comment Formatting" section of the guide!) is that one should use #if 0 ... #endif to create large blocks of comments. After some digging, I found a single case of such usage, in include/llvm/Support/GenericDomTreeConstruction.h:
// This is more understandable as a recursive algorithm, but we can't use the
// recursive algorithm due to stack depth issues. Keep it here for
// documentation purposes.
#if 0
... // some code left for documentation
#else
... // some real code
#endif
All other usages are to disable code from being compiled (usually some code for debug output), like this (from include/llvm/ADT/SCCIterator.h):
#if 0 // Enable if needed when debugging.
dbgs() << "TarjanSCC: Node " << N <<
" : visitNum = " << visitNum << "\n";
#endif
My proposal is not to ban latter usages, but to remove / change the paragraph in "Comment Formatting" section -- to make it clearer for people like me. :-)
It can be changes as follows:
Commenting out large blocks of code is discouraged, but if you really have to do this (for documentation purposes or as a suggestion for debug printing), use ``#if 0`` and ``#endif``. These nest properly and are better behaved in general than C style comments.
Please let me know what your preference is.
Andrey
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23404
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list