[llvm] r277500 - AMDGPU: Track physical registers in SIWholeQuadMode

Hans Wennborg via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 3 11:17:38 PDT 2016


Merged in r277619.

Thanks,
Hans

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:04:04AM -0700, Hans Wennborg wrote:
>> Sounds good to me if Tom approves.
>>
>
> This is fine with me.
>
> -Tom
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Hans,
>> >
>> > this is a bug fix that should go into the 3.9 release branch.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Nicolai
>> >
>> >
>> > On 02.08.2016 21:17, Nicolai Haehnle via llvm-commits wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Author: nha
>> >> Date: Tue Aug  2 14:17:37 2016
>> >> New Revision: 277500
>> >>
>> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=277500&view=rev
>> >> Log:
>> >> AMDGPU: Track physical registers in SIWholeQuadMode
>> >>
>> >> Summary:
>> >> There are cases where uniform branch conditions are computed in VGPRs, and
>> >> we didn't correctly mark those as WQM.
>> >>
>> >> The stray change in basic-branch.ll is because invoking the LiveIntervals
>> >> analysis leads to the detection of a dead register that would otherwise
>> >> not
>> >> be seen at -O0.
>> >>
>> >> This is a candidate for the 3.9 branch, as it fixes a possible hang.
>> >>
>> >> Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
>> >>
>> >> Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits, kzhuravl
>> >>
>> >> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22673
>> >>
>> >> Modified:
>> >>     llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIWholeQuadMode.cpp
>> >>     llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/basic-branch.ll
>> >>     llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/wqm.ll
>> >>
>> >> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIWholeQuadMode.cpp
>> >> URL:
>> >> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIWholeQuadMode.cpp?rev=277500&r1=277499&r2=277500&view=diff
>> >>
>> >> ==============================================================================
>> >> --- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIWholeQuadMode.cpp (original)
>> >> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIWholeQuadMode.cpp Tue Aug  2 14:17:37
>> >> 2016
>> >> @@ -94,12 +94,15 @@ private:
>> >>    const SIInstrInfo *TII;
>> >>    const SIRegisterInfo *TRI;
>> >>    MachineRegisterInfo *MRI;
>> >> +  LiveIntervals *LIS;
>> >>
>> >>    DenseMap<const MachineInstr *, InstrInfo> Instructions;
>> >>    DenseMap<MachineBasicBlock *, BlockInfo> Blocks;
>> >>    SmallVector<const MachineInstr *, 2> ExecExports;
>> >>    SmallVector<MachineInstr *, 1> LiveMaskQueries;
>> >>
>> >> +  void markInstruction(MachineInstr &MI, char Flag,
>> >> +                       std::vector<WorkItem> &Worklist);
>> >>    char scanInstructions(MachineFunction &MF, std::vector<WorkItem>
>> >> &Worklist);
>> >>    void propagateInstruction(MachineInstr &MI, std::vector<WorkItem>
>> >> &Worklist);
>> >>    void propagateBlock(MachineBasicBlock &MBB, std::vector<WorkItem>
>> >> &Worklist);
>> >> @@ -126,6 +129,7 @@ public:
>> >>    }
>> >>
>> >>    void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override {
>> >> +    AU.addRequired<LiveIntervals>();
>> >>      AU.setPreservesCFG();
>> >>      MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU);
>> >>    }
>> >> @@ -135,8 +139,11 @@ public:
>> >>
>> >>  char SIWholeQuadMode::ID = 0;
>> >>
>> >> -INITIALIZE_PASS(SIWholeQuadMode, DEBUG_TYPE,
>> >> -                "SI Whole Quad Mode", false, false)
>> >> +INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(SIWholeQuadMode, DEBUG_TYPE, "SI Whole Quad Mode",
>> >> false,
>> >> +                      false)
>> >> +INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LiveIntervals)
>> >> +INITIALIZE_PASS_END(SIWholeQuadMode, DEBUG_TYPE, "SI Whole Quad Mode",
>> >> false,
>> >> +                    false)
>> >>
>> >>  char &llvm::SIWholeQuadModeID = SIWholeQuadMode::ID;
>> >>
>> >> @@ -144,6 +151,23 @@ FunctionPass *llvm::createSIWholeQuadMod
>> >>    return new SIWholeQuadMode;
>> >>  }
>> >>
>> >> +void SIWholeQuadMode::markInstruction(MachineInstr &MI, char Flag,
>> >> +                                      std::vector<WorkItem> &Worklist) {
>> >> +  InstrInfo &II = Instructions[&MI];
>> >> +
>> >> +  assert(Flag == StateWQM || Flag == StateExact);
>> >> +
>> >> +  // Ignore if the instruction is already marked. The typical case is
>> >> that we
>> >> +  // mark an instruction WQM multiple times, but for atomics it can
>> >> happen that
>> >> +  // Flag is StateWQM, but Needs is already set to StateExact. In this
>> >> case,
>> >> +  // letting the atomic run in StateExact is correct as per the relevant
>> >> specs.
>> >> +  if (II.Needs)
>> >> +    return;
>> >> +
>> >> +  II.Needs = Flag;
>> >> +  Worklist.push_back(&MI);
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >>  // Scan instructions to determine which ones require an Exact execmask
>> >> and
>> >>  // which ones seed WQM requirements.
>> >>  char SIWholeQuadMode::scanInstructions(MachineFunction &MF,
>> >> @@ -192,8 +216,7 @@ char SIWholeQuadMode::scanInstructions(M
>> >>            continue;
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >> -      Instructions[&MI].Needs = Flags;
>> >> -      Worklist.push_back(&MI);
>> >> +      markInstruction(MI, Flags, Worklist);
>> >>        GlobalFlags |= Flags;
>> >>      }
>> >>
>> >> @@ -249,32 +272,35 @@ void SIWholeQuadMode::propagateInstructi
>> >>      if (!Use.isReg() || !Use.isUse())
>> >>        continue;
>> >>
>> >> -    // At this point, physical registers appear as inputs or outputs
>> >> -    // and following them makes no sense (and would in fact be incorrect
>> >> -    // when the same VGPR is used as both an output and an input that
>> >> leads
>> >> -    // to a NeedsWQM instruction).
>> >> -    //
>> >> -    // Note: VCC appears e.g. in 64-bit addition with carry -
>> >> theoretically we
>> >> -    // have to trace this, in practice it happens for 64-bit computations
>> >> like
>> >> -    // pointers where both dwords are followed already anyway.
>> >> -    if (!TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(Use.getReg()))
>> >> -      continue;
>> >> -
>> >> -    for (MachineInstr &DefMI : MRI->def_instructions(Use.getReg())) {
>> >> -      InstrInfo &DefII = Instructions[&DefMI];
>> >> +    unsigned Reg = Use.getReg();
>> >>
>> >> -      // Obviously skip if DefMI is already flagged as NeedWQM.
>> >> -      //
>> >> -      // The instruction might also be flagged as NeedExact. This happens
>> >> when
>> >> -      // the result of an atomic is used in a WQM computation. In this
>> >> case,
>> >> -      // the atomic must not run for helper pixels and the WQM result is
>> >> -      // undefined.
>> >> -      if (DefII.Needs != 0)
>> >> +    // Handle physical registers that we need to track; this is mostly
>> >> relevant
>> >> +    // for VCC, which can appear as the (implicit) input of a uniform
>> >> branch,
>> >> +    // e.g. when a loop counter is stored in a VGPR.
>> >> +    if (!TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(Reg)) {
>> >> +      if (Reg == AMDGPU::EXEC)
>> >>          continue;
>> >>
>> >> -      DefII.Needs = StateWQM;
>> >> -      Worklist.push_back(&DefMI);
>> >> +      for (MCRegUnitIterator RegUnit(Reg, TRI); RegUnit.isValid();
>> >> ++RegUnit) {
>> >> +        LiveRange &LR = LIS->getRegUnit(*RegUnit);
>> >> +        const VNInfo *Value =
>> >> LR.Query(LIS->getInstructionIndex(MI)).valueIn();
>> >> +        if (!Value)
>> >> +          continue;
>> >> +
>> >> +        // Since we're in machine SSA, we do not need to track physical
>> >> +        // registers across basic blocks.
>> >> +        if (Value->isPHIDef())
>> >> +          continue;
>> >> +
>> >> +        markInstruction(*LIS->getInstructionFromIndex(Value->def),
>> >> StateWQM,
>> >> +                        Worklist);
>> >> +      }
>> >> +
>> >> +      continue;
>> >>      }
>> >> +
>> >> +    for (MachineInstr &DefMI : MRI->def_instructions(Use.getReg()))
>> >> +      markInstruction(DefMI, StateWQM, Worklist);
>> >>    }
>> >>  }
>> >>
>> >> @@ -471,6 +497,7 @@ bool SIWholeQuadMode::runOnMachineFuncti
>> >>    TII = ST.getInstrInfo();
>> >>    TRI = &TII->getRegisterInfo();
>> >>    MRI = &MF.getRegInfo();
>> >> +  LIS = &getAnalysis<LiveIntervals>();
>> >>
>> >>    char GlobalFlags = analyzeFunction(MF);
>> >>    if (!(GlobalFlags & StateWQM)) {
>> >>
>> >> Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/basic-branch.ll
>> >> URL:
>> >> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/basic-branch.ll?rev=277500&r1=277499&r2=277500&view=diff
>> >>
>> >> ==============================================================================
>> >> --- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/basic-branch.ll (original)
>> >> +++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/basic-branch.ll Tue Aug  2 14:17:37
>> >> 2016
>> >> @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
>> >>  ; GCN-LABEL: {{^}}test_branch:
>> >>  ; GCNNOOPT: v_writelane_b32
>> >>  ; GCNNOOPT: v_writelane_b32
>> >> -; GCNNOOPT: v_writelane_b32
>> >>  ; GCN: s_cbranch_scc1 [[END:BB[0-9]+_[0-9]+]]
>> >>
>> >>  ; GCN: ; BB#1
>> >>
>> >> Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/wqm.ll
>> >> URL:
>> >> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/wqm.ll?rev=277500&r1=277499&r2=277500&view=diff
>> >>
>> >> ==============================================================================
>> >> --- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/wqm.ll (original)
>> >> +++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/wqm.ll Tue Aug  2 14:17:37 2016
>> >> @@ -350,6 +350,44 @@ main_body:
>> >>    ret float %s
>> >>  }
>> >>
>> >> +; CHECK-LABEL: {{^}}test_loop_vcc:
>> >> +; CHECK-NEXT: ; %entry
>> >> +; CHECK-NEXT: s_mov_b64 [[LIVE:s\[[0-9]+:[0-9]+\]]], exec
>> >> +; CHECK: s_wqm_b64 exec, exec
>> >> +; CHECK: s_and_b64 exec, exec, [[LIVE]]
>> >> +; CHECK: image_store
>> >> +; CHECK: s_wqm_b64 exec, exec
>> >> +; CHECK: v_mov_b32_e32 [[CTR:v[0-9]+]], -2
>> >> +; CHECK: s_branch [[LOOPHDR:BB[0-9]+_[0-9]+]]
>> >> +
>> >> +; CHECK: [[LOOPHDR]]: ; %loop
>> >> +; CHECK: v_add_i32_e32 [[CTR]], vcc, 2, [[CTR]]
>> >> +; CHECK: v_cmp_lt_i32_e32 vcc, 7, [[CTR]]
>> >> +; CHECK: s_cbranch_vccz
>> >> +; CHECK: ; %break
>> >> +
>> >> +; CHECK: ; return
>> >> +define amdgpu_ps <4 x float> @test_loop_vcc(<4 x float> %in) nounwind {
>> >> +entry:
>> >> +  call void @llvm.amdgcn.image.store.v4i32(<4 x float> %in, <4 x i32>
>> >> undef, <8 x i32> undef, i32 15, i1 0, i1 0, i1 0, i1 0)
>> >> +  br label %loop
>> >> +
>> >> +loop:
>> >> +  %ctr.iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %ctr.next, %body ]
>> >> +  %c.iv = phi <4 x float> [ %in, %entry ], [ %c.next, %body ]
>> >> +  %cc = icmp sgt i32 %ctr.iv, 7
>> >> +  br i1 %cc, label %break, label %body
>> >> +
>> >> +body:
>> >> +  %c.i = bitcast <4 x float> %c.iv to <4 x i32>
>> >> +  %c.next = call <4 x float> @llvm.SI.image.sample.v4i32(<4 x i32> %c.i,
>> >> <8 x i32> undef, <4 x i32> undef, i32 15, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0,
>> >> i32 0, i32 0)
>> >> +  %ctr.next = add i32 %ctr.iv, 2
>> >> +  br label %loop
>> >> +
>> >> +break:
>> >> +  ret <4 x float> %c.iv
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >>  declare void @llvm.amdgcn.image.store.v4i32(<4 x float>, <4 x i32>, <8 x
>> >> i32>, i32, i1, i1, i1, i1) #1
>> >>
>> >>  declare <4 x float> @llvm.amdgcn.image.load.v4i32(<4 x i32>, <8 x i32>,
>> >> i32, i1, i1, i1, i1) #2
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> llvm-commits mailing list
>> >> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
>> >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>> >>
>> >


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list