[llvm] r277500 - AMDGPU: Track physical registers in SIWholeQuadMode

Nicolai Haehnle via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Aug 2 12:17:37 PDT 2016


Author: nha
Date: Tue Aug  2 14:17:37 2016
New Revision: 277500

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=277500&view=rev
Log:
AMDGPU: Track physical registers in SIWholeQuadMode

Summary:
There are cases where uniform branch conditions are computed in VGPRs, and
we didn't correctly mark those as WQM.

The stray change in basic-branch.ll is because invoking the LiveIntervals
analysis leads to the detection of a dead register that would otherwise not
be seen at -O0.

This is a candidate for the 3.9 branch, as it fixes a possible hang.

Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko

Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits, kzhuravl

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22673

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIWholeQuadMode.cpp
    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/basic-branch.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/wqm.ll

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIWholeQuadMode.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIWholeQuadMode.cpp?rev=277500&r1=277499&r2=277500&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIWholeQuadMode.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIWholeQuadMode.cpp Tue Aug  2 14:17:37 2016
@@ -94,12 +94,15 @@ private:
   const SIInstrInfo *TII;
   const SIRegisterInfo *TRI;
   MachineRegisterInfo *MRI;
+  LiveIntervals *LIS;
 
   DenseMap<const MachineInstr *, InstrInfo> Instructions;
   DenseMap<MachineBasicBlock *, BlockInfo> Blocks;
   SmallVector<const MachineInstr *, 2> ExecExports;
   SmallVector<MachineInstr *, 1> LiveMaskQueries;
 
+  void markInstruction(MachineInstr &MI, char Flag,
+                       std::vector<WorkItem> &Worklist);
   char scanInstructions(MachineFunction &MF, std::vector<WorkItem> &Worklist);
   void propagateInstruction(MachineInstr &MI, std::vector<WorkItem> &Worklist);
   void propagateBlock(MachineBasicBlock &MBB, std::vector<WorkItem> &Worklist);
@@ -126,6 +129,7 @@ public:
   }
 
   void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override {
+    AU.addRequired<LiveIntervals>();
     AU.setPreservesCFG();
     MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU);
   }
@@ -135,8 +139,11 @@ public:
 
 char SIWholeQuadMode::ID = 0;
 
-INITIALIZE_PASS(SIWholeQuadMode, DEBUG_TYPE,
-                "SI Whole Quad Mode", false, false)
+INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(SIWholeQuadMode, DEBUG_TYPE, "SI Whole Quad Mode", false,
+                      false)
+INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LiveIntervals)
+INITIALIZE_PASS_END(SIWholeQuadMode, DEBUG_TYPE, "SI Whole Quad Mode", false,
+                    false)
 
 char &llvm::SIWholeQuadModeID = SIWholeQuadMode::ID;
 
@@ -144,6 +151,23 @@ FunctionPass *llvm::createSIWholeQuadMod
   return new SIWholeQuadMode;
 }
 
+void SIWholeQuadMode::markInstruction(MachineInstr &MI, char Flag,
+                                      std::vector<WorkItem> &Worklist) {
+  InstrInfo &II = Instructions[&MI];
+
+  assert(Flag == StateWQM || Flag == StateExact);
+
+  // Ignore if the instruction is already marked. The typical case is that we
+  // mark an instruction WQM multiple times, but for atomics it can happen that
+  // Flag is StateWQM, but Needs is already set to StateExact. In this case,
+  // letting the atomic run in StateExact is correct as per the relevant specs.
+  if (II.Needs)
+    return;
+
+  II.Needs = Flag;
+  Worklist.push_back(&MI);
+}
+
 // Scan instructions to determine which ones require an Exact execmask and
 // which ones seed WQM requirements.
 char SIWholeQuadMode::scanInstructions(MachineFunction &MF,
@@ -192,8 +216,7 @@ char SIWholeQuadMode::scanInstructions(M
           continue;
       }
 
-      Instructions[&MI].Needs = Flags;
-      Worklist.push_back(&MI);
+      markInstruction(MI, Flags, Worklist);
       GlobalFlags |= Flags;
     }
 
@@ -249,32 +272,35 @@ void SIWholeQuadMode::propagateInstructi
     if (!Use.isReg() || !Use.isUse())
       continue;
 
-    // At this point, physical registers appear as inputs or outputs
-    // and following them makes no sense (and would in fact be incorrect
-    // when the same VGPR is used as both an output and an input that leads
-    // to a NeedsWQM instruction).
-    //
-    // Note: VCC appears e.g. in 64-bit addition with carry - theoretically we
-    // have to trace this, in practice it happens for 64-bit computations like
-    // pointers where both dwords are followed already anyway.
-    if (!TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(Use.getReg()))
-      continue;
-
-    for (MachineInstr &DefMI : MRI->def_instructions(Use.getReg())) {
-      InstrInfo &DefII = Instructions[&DefMI];
+    unsigned Reg = Use.getReg();
 
-      // Obviously skip if DefMI is already flagged as NeedWQM.
-      //
-      // The instruction might also be flagged as NeedExact. This happens when
-      // the result of an atomic is used in a WQM computation. In this case,
-      // the atomic must not run for helper pixels and the WQM result is
-      // undefined.
-      if (DefII.Needs != 0)
+    // Handle physical registers that we need to track; this is mostly relevant
+    // for VCC, which can appear as the (implicit) input of a uniform branch,
+    // e.g. when a loop counter is stored in a VGPR.
+    if (!TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(Reg)) {
+      if (Reg == AMDGPU::EXEC)
         continue;
 
-      DefII.Needs = StateWQM;
-      Worklist.push_back(&DefMI);
+      for (MCRegUnitIterator RegUnit(Reg, TRI); RegUnit.isValid(); ++RegUnit) {
+        LiveRange &LR = LIS->getRegUnit(*RegUnit);
+        const VNInfo *Value = LR.Query(LIS->getInstructionIndex(MI)).valueIn();
+        if (!Value)
+          continue;
+
+        // Since we're in machine SSA, we do not need to track physical
+        // registers across basic blocks.
+        if (Value->isPHIDef())
+          continue;
+
+        markInstruction(*LIS->getInstructionFromIndex(Value->def), StateWQM,
+                        Worklist);
+      }
+
+      continue;
     }
+
+    for (MachineInstr &DefMI : MRI->def_instructions(Use.getReg()))
+      markInstruction(DefMI, StateWQM, Worklist);
   }
 }
 
@@ -471,6 +497,7 @@ bool SIWholeQuadMode::runOnMachineFuncti
   TII = ST.getInstrInfo();
   TRI = &TII->getRegisterInfo();
   MRI = &MF.getRegInfo();
+  LIS = &getAnalysis<LiveIntervals>();
 
   char GlobalFlags = analyzeFunction(MF);
   if (!(GlobalFlags & StateWQM)) {

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/basic-branch.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/basic-branch.ll?rev=277500&r1=277499&r2=277500&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/basic-branch.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/basic-branch.ll Tue Aug  2 14:17:37 2016
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
 ; GCN-LABEL: {{^}}test_branch:
 ; GCNNOOPT: v_writelane_b32
 ; GCNNOOPT: v_writelane_b32
-; GCNNOOPT: v_writelane_b32
 ; GCN: s_cbranch_scc1 [[END:BB[0-9]+_[0-9]+]]
 
 ; GCN: ; BB#1

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/wqm.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/wqm.ll?rev=277500&r1=277499&r2=277500&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/wqm.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/wqm.ll Tue Aug  2 14:17:37 2016
@@ -350,6 +350,44 @@ main_body:
   ret float %s
 }
 
+; CHECK-LABEL: {{^}}test_loop_vcc:
+; CHECK-NEXT: ; %entry
+; CHECK-NEXT: s_mov_b64 [[LIVE:s\[[0-9]+:[0-9]+\]]], exec
+; CHECK: s_wqm_b64 exec, exec
+; CHECK: s_and_b64 exec, exec, [[LIVE]]
+; CHECK: image_store
+; CHECK: s_wqm_b64 exec, exec
+; CHECK: v_mov_b32_e32 [[CTR:v[0-9]+]], -2
+; CHECK: s_branch [[LOOPHDR:BB[0-9]+_[0-9]+]]
+
+; CHECK: [[LOOPHDR]]: ; %loop
+; CHECK: v_add_i32_e32 [[CTR]], vcc, 2, [[CTR]]
+; CHECK: v_cmp_lt_i32_e32 vcc, 7, [[CTR]]
+; CHECK: s_cbranch_vccz
+; CHECK: ; %break
+
+; CHECK: ; return
+define amdgpu_ps <4 x float> @test_loop_vcc(<4 x float> %in) nounwind {
+entry:
+  call void @llvm.amdgcn.image.store.v4i32(<4 x float> %in, <4 x i32> undef, <8 x i32> undef, i32 15, i1 0, i1 0, i1 0, i1 0)
+  br label %loop
+
+loop:
+  %ctr.iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %ctr.next, %body ]
+  %c.iv = phi <4 x float> [ %in, %entry ], [ %c.next, %body ]
+  %cc = icmp sgt i32 %ctr.iv, 7
+  br i1 %cc, label %break, label %body
+
+body:
+  %c.i = bitcast <4 x float> %c.iv to <4 x i32>
+  %c.next = call <4 x float> @llvm.SI.image.sample.v4i32(<4 x i32> %c.i, <8 x i32> undef, <4 x i32> undef, i32 15, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0)
+  %ctr.next = add i32 %ctr.iv, 2
+  br label %loop
+
+break:
+  ret <4 x float> %c.iv
+}
+
 declare void @llvm.amdgcn.image.store.v4i32(<4 x float>, <4 x i32>, <8 x i32>, i32, i1, i1, i1, i1) #1
 
 declare <4 x float> @llvm.amdgcn.image.load.v4i32(<4 x i32>, <8 x i32>, i32, i1, i1, i1, i1) #2




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list