[PATCH] D22713: Fix - CodeExtractor : Inherit Target Dependent Attributes from the parent function.
Sean Silva via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jul 31 20:23:14 PDT 2016
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL277315: Fix - CodeExtractor : Inherit Target Dependent Attributes from the parent… (authored by silvas).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22713?vs=66083&id=66275#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22713
Files:
llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/CodeExtractor.cpp
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeExtractor/InheritTargetAttributes.ll
Index: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/CodeExtractor.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/CodeExtractor.cpp
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/CodeExtractor.cpp
@@ -351,7 +351,22 @@
// If the old function is no-throw, so is the new one.
if (oldFunction->doesNotThrow())
newFunction->setDoesNotThrow();
-
+
+ // Inherit the uwtable attribute if we need to.
+ if (oldFunction->hasUWTable())
+ newFunction->setHasUWTable();
+
+ // Inherit all of the target dependent attributes.
+ // (e.g. If the extracted region contains a call to an x86.sse
+ // instruction we need to make sure that the extracted region has the
+ // "target-features" attribute allowing it to be lowered.
+ // FIXME: This should be changed to check to see if a specific
+ // attribute can not be inherited.
+ AttributeSet OldFnAttrs = oldFunction->getAttributes().getFnAttributes();
+ AttrBuilder AB(OldFnAttrs, AttributeSet::FunctionIndex);
+ for (auto Attr : AB.td_attrs())
+ newFunction->addFnAttr(Attr.first, Attr.second);
+
newFunction->getBasicBlockList().push_back(newRootNode);
// Create an iterator to name all of the arguments we inserted.
Index: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeExtractor/InheritTargetAttributes.ll
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeExtractor/InheritTargetAttributes.ll
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CodeExtractor/InheritTargetAttributes.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+; RUN: opt < %s -partial-inliner | llc -filetype=null
+; RUN: opt < %s -partial-inliner -S | FileCheck %s
+; This testcase checks to see if CodeExtractor properly inherits
+; target specific attributes for the extracted function. This can
+; cause certain instructions that depend on the attributes to not
+; be lowered. Like in this test where we try to 'select' the blendvps
+; intrinsic on x86 that requires the +sse4.1 target feature.
+
+target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
+target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
+
+; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone
+declare <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse41.blendvps(<4 x float>, <4 x float>, <4 x float>) #0
+
+; Function Attrs: nounwind uwtable
+define <4 x float> @inlinedFunc(i1, <4 x float>, <4 x float>, <4 x float>) #1 {
+entry:
+ br i1 %0, label %if.then, label %return
+if.then:
+; Target intrinsic that requires sse4.1
+ %target.call = call <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse41.blendvps(<4 x float> %1, <4 x float> %2, <4 x float> %3)
+ br label %return
+return: ; preds = %entry
+ %retval = phi <4 x float> [ zeroinitializer, %entry ], [ %target.call, %if.then ]
+ ret <4 x float> %retval
+}
+
+; Function Attrs: nounwind uwtable
+define <4 x float> @dummyCaller(i1, <4 x float>, <4 x float>, <4 x float>) #1 {
+entry:
+ %val = call <4 x float> @inlinedFunc(i1 %0, <4 x float> %1, <4 x float> %2, <4 x float> %3)
+ ret <4 x float> %val
+}
+
+
+attributes #0 = { nounwind readnone }
+attributes #1 = { nounwind uwtable "target-cpu"="x86-64" "target-features"="+sse4.1" }
+
+; CHECK: define {{.*}} @inlinedFunc.1_if.then{{.*}} [[COUNT1:#[0-9]+]]
+; CHECK: [[COUNT1]] = { {{.*}} "target-cpu"="x86-64" "target-features"="+sse4.1" }
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D22713.66275.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3267 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20160801/3b23084f/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list