[PATCH] D22037: [RFC] Refactoring release docs

[Renato Golin via llvm-commits]

rengolin added a comment.

I'm changing "x86_64" to x86 to mean the target in LLVM, not the specific architecture, so we don't start with too many variations (ex i386, i586, i686, etc), which is pointless.


================
Comment at: RELEASE_TESTERS.TXT:25
@@ +24,3 @@
+E: brian.cain at gmail.com
+T: x85_64
+O: CentOS
----------------
dim wrote:
> s/x85/x86/ :)
How did that go in there?

================
Comment at: RELEASE_TESTERS.TXT:30
@@ +29,3 @@
+E: bero at linaro.org
+T: x86_64
+O: OpenMandriva
----------------
bero wrote:
> x86_64, i586, aarch64, armv7hnl. i586 will probably be replaced with i686 soon-ish.
This is not about what you do, but what you're responsible for, in the LLVM community.

================
Comment at: RELEASE_TESTERS.TXT:31
@@ +30,3 @@
+T: x86_64
+O: OpenMandriva
+
----------------
bero wrote:
> May make sense to add AOSP -- will definitely run test builds there once Minseong's stuff is ready
We can update once that's working. I don't want to promise anything.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D22037