[compiler-rt] r275486 - [compiler-rt] Fix missing frame with stackwalking on windows 64-bits
Etienne Bergeron via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jul 14 15:04:28 PDT 2016
Author: etienneb
Date: Thu Jul 14 17:04:28 2016
New Revision: 275486
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275486&view=rev
Log:
[compiler-rt] Fix missing frame with stackwalking on windows 64-bits
Summary: Fix missing frame with stackwalking on windows 64-bits
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits, wang0109, kubabrecka, chrisha
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22358
Modified:
compiler-rt/trunk/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_win.cc
Modified: compiler-rt/trunk/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_win.cc
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/compiler-rt/trunk/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_win.cc?rev=275486&r1=275485&r2=275486&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- compiler-rt/trunk/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_win.cc (original)
+++ compiler-rt/trunk/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_win.cc Thu Jul 14 17:04:28 2016
@@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ void BufferedStackTrace::SlowUnwindStack
// FIXME: CaptureStackBackTrace might be too slow for us.
// FIXME: Compare with StackWalk64.
// FIXME: Look at LLVMUnhandledExceptionFilter in Signals.inc
- size = CaptureStackBackTrace(2, Min(max_depth, kStackTraceMax),
+ size = CaptureStackBackTrace(1, Min(max_depth, kStackTraceMax),
(void**)trace, 0);
if (size == 0)
return;
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list