[llvm] r274452 - [PM] Port LoopAccessInfo analysis to new PM

Xinliang David Li via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Jul 2 14:18:40 PDT 2016


Author: davidxl
Date: Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
New Revision: 274452

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=274452&view=rev
Log:
[PM] Port LoopAccessInfo analysis to new PM

It is implemented as a LoopAnalysis pass as 
discussed and agreed upon.

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h
    llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
    llvm/trunk/lib/Passes/PassBuilder.cpp
    llvm/trunk/lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/backward-dep-different-types.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/forward-loop-carried.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/forward-loop-independent.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/independent-interleaved.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/memcheck-for-loop-invariant.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/multiple-strides-rt-memory-checks.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/non-wrapping-pointer.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/nullptr.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/number-of-memchecks.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/pointer-with-unknown-bounds.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/resort-to-memchecks-only.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/reverse-memcheck-bounds.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/safe-no-checks.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/safe-with-dep-distance.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/store-to-invariant-check2.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/store-to-invariant-check3.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/stride-access-dependence.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/underlying-objects-1.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/underlying-objects-2.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/unsafe-and-rt-checks.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/wrapping-pointer-versioning.ll

Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -772,6 +772,28 @@ private:
   LoopInfo *LI;
 };
 
+/// \brief LoopAccessInfoAnalysis
+class LoopAccessInfoAnalysis
+    : public AnalysisInfoMixin<LoopAccessInfoAnalysis> {
+  friend AnalysisInfoMixin<LoopAccessInfoAnalysis>;
+  static char PassID;
+
+public:
+  typedef LoopAccessInfo Result;
+  Result run(Loop &, AnalysisManager<Loop> &);
+  static StringRef name() { return "LoopAccessInfoAnalysis"; }
+};
+
+/// \brief Printer pass for the \c BlockFrequencyInfo results.
+class LoopAccessInfoPrinterPass
+    : public PassInfoMixin<LoopAccessInfoPrinterPass> {
+  raw_ostream &OS;
+
+public:
+  explicit LoopAccessInfoPrinterPass(raw_ostream &OS) : OS(OS) {}
+  PreservedAnalyses run(Loop &L, AnalysisManager<Loop> &AM);
+};
+
 inline Instruction *MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::getSource(
     const LoopAccessInfo &LAI) const {
   return LAI.getDepChecker().getMemoryInstructions()[Source];

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 
 #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h"
 #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPassManager.h"
 #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h"
 #include "llvm/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.h"
 #include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h"
@@ -21,6 +22,7 @@
 #include "llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h"
 #include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
 #include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/PassManager.h"
 #include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
 #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
 using namespace llvm;
@@ -2022,6 +2024,32 @@ INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTree
 INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopInfoWrapperPass)
 INITIALIZE_PASS_END(LoopAccessAnalysis, LAA_NAME, laa_name, false, true)
 
+char LoopAccessInfoAnalysis::PassID;
+
+LoopAccessInfo LoopAccessInfoAnalysis::run(Loop &L, AnalysisManager<Loop> &AM) {
+  // FIXME: ugly const cast
+  AnalysisManager<Function> &FAM = const_cast<FunctionAnalysisManager &>(
+      AM.getResult<FunctionAnalysisManagerLoopProxy>(L).getManager());
+  Function &F = *L.getHeader()->getParent();
+  auto *SE = &FAM.getResult<ScalarEvolutionAnalysis>(F);
+  auto *TLI = FAM.getCachedResult<TargetLibraryAnalysis>(F);
+  auto *AA = &FAM.getResult<AAManager>(F);
+  auto *DT = &FAM.getResult<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(F);
+  auto *LI = &FAM.getResult<LoopAnalysis>(F);
+  const DataLayout &DL = F.getParent()->getDataLayout();
+  return LoopAccessInfo(&L, SE, DL, TLI, AA, DT, LI);
+}
+
+PreservedAnalyses LoopAccessInfoPrinterPass::run(Loop &L,
+                                                 AnalysisManager<Loop> &AM) {
+  Function &F = *L.getHeader()->getParent();
+  auto &LAI = AM.getResult<LoopAccessInfoAnalysis>(L);
+  OS << "Loop access info in function '" << F.getName() << "':\n";
+  OS.indent(2) << L.getHeader()->getName() << ":\n";
+  LAI.print(OS, 4);
+  return PreservedAnalyses::all();
+}
+
 namespace llvm {
   Pass *createLAAPass() {
     return new LoopAccessAnalysis();

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Passes/PassBuilder.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Passes/PassBuilder.cpp?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Passes/PassBuilder.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Passes/PassBuilder.cpp Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 #include "llvm/Analysis/GlobalsModRef.h"
 #include "llvm/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.h"
 #include "llvm/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h"
 #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
 #include "llvm/Analysis/MemoryDependenceAnalysis.h"
 #include "llvm/Analysis/PostDominators.h"

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ FUNCTION_PASS("verify<regions>", RegionI
 #define LOOP_ANALYSIS(NAME, CREATE_PASS)
 #endif
 LOOP_ANALYSIS("no-op-loop", NoOpLoopAnalysis())
+LOOP_ANALYSIS("access-info", LoopAccessInfoAnalysis())
 #undef LOOP_ANALYSIS
 
 #ifndef LOOP_PASS
@@ -182,4 +183,5 @@ LOOP_PASS("no-op-loop", NoOpLoopPass())
 LOOP_PASS("print", PrintLoopPass(dbgs()))
 LOOP_PASS("simplify-cfg", LoopSimplifyCFGPass())
 LOOP_PASS("indvars", IndVarSimplifyPass())
+LOOP_PASS("print-access-info", LoopAccessInfoPrinterPass(dbgs()))
 #undef LOOP_PASS

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/backward-dep-different-types.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/backward-dep-different-types.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/backward-dep-different-types.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/backward-dep-different-types.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s  2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ; In this loop just because we access A through different types (int, float)
 ; we still have a dependence cycle:

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/forward-loop-carried.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/forward-loop-carried.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/forward-loop-carried.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/forward-loop-carried.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output  < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ;   for (unsigned i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
 ;     A[i+8] = B[i] + 2;

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/forward-loop-independent.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/forward-loop-independent.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/forward-loop-independent.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/forward-loop-independent.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output  < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ; Check that loop-indepedent forward dependences are discovered properly.
 ;

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/independent-interleaved.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/independent-interleaved.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/independent-interleaved.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/independent-interleaved.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt < %s -store-to-load-forwarding-conflict-detection=false -loop-accesses -analyze | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -store-to-load-forwarding-conflict-detection=false  -disable-output  < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ; This test checks that we prove the strided accesses to be independent before
 ; concluding that there is a forward dependence.

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/memcheck-for-loop-invariant.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/memcheck-for-loop-invariant.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/memcheck-for-loop-invariant.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/memcheck-for-loop-invariant.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output  < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ; Handle memchecks involving loop-invariant addresses:
 ;

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/multiple-strides-rt-memory-checks.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/multiple-strides-rt-memory-checks.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/multiple-strides-rt-memory-checks.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/multiple-strides-rt-memory-checks.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -S < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output  < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ; This is the test case from PR26314.
 ; When we were retrying dependence checking with memchecks only, 

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/non-wrapping-pointer.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/non-wrapping-pointer.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/non-wrapping-pointer.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/non-wrapping-pointer.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -basicaa -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -aa-pipeline='basic-aa' -disable-output < %s  2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ; For this loop:
 ;   for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/nullptr.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/nullptr.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/nullptr.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/nullptr.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze %s  | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output  < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ; Test that the loop accesses are proven safe in this case.
 ; The analyzer uses to be confused by the "diamond" because GetUnderlyingObjects

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/number-of-memchecks.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/number-of-memchecks.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/number-of-memchecks.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/number-of-memchecks.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output  < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128"
 target triple = "aarch64--linux-gnueabi"

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/pointer-with-unknown-bounds.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/pointer-with-unknown-bounds.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/pointer-with-unknown-bounds.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/pointer-with-unknown-bounds.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output  < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
 

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/resort-to-memchecks-only.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/resort-to-memchecks-only.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/resort-to-memchecks-only.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/resort-to-memchecks-only.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output  < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ; We give up analyzing the dependences in this loop due to non-constant
 ; distance between A[i+offset] and A[i] and add memchecks to prove

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/reverse-memcheck-bounds.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/reverse-memcheck-bounds.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/reverse-memcheck-bounds.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/reverse-memcheck-bounds.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output  < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ; The runtime memory check code and the access grouping
 ; algorithm both assume that the start and end values

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/safe-no-checks.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/safe-no-checks.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/safe-no-checks.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/safe-no-checks.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -basicaa -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -aa-pipeline='basic-aa' -disable-output < %s  2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ; If the arrays don't alias this loop is safe with no memchecks:
 ;   for (i = 0; i < n; i++)

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/safe-with-dep-distance.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/safe-with-dep-distance.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/safe-with-dep-distance.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/safe-with-dep-distance.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output  < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ; Analyze this loop:
 ;   for (i = 0; i < n; i++)

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/store-to-invariant-check2.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/store-to-invariant-check2.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/store-to-invariant-check2.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/store-to-invariant-check2.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt < %s -loop-accesses -analyze  | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output  < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ; Test to confirm LAA will not find store to invariant address.
 ; Inner loop has no store to invariant address.

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/store-to-invariant-check3.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/store-to-invariant-check3.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/store-to-invariant-check3.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/store-to-invariant-check3.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt < %s -loop-accesses -analyze | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output  < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ; Test to confirm LAA will find store to invariant address.
 ; Inner loop has a store to invariant address.

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/stride-access-dependence.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/stride-access-dependence.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/stride-access-dependence.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/stride-access-dependence.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output  < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128"
 
@@ -384,7 +385,7 @@ for.body:
 ;   return sum;
 ; }
 
-; CHECK: for function 'vectorizable_unscaled_Write_Read':
+; CHECK: function 'vectorizable_unscaled_Write_Read':
 ; CHECK-NEXT:   for.body:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:     Memory dependences are safe
 ; CHECK-NEXT:     Dependences:

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/underlying-objects-1.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/underlying-objects-1.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/underlying-objects-1.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/underlying-objects-1.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -basicaa -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output  < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ; In:
 ;

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/underlying-objects-2.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/underlying-objects-2.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/underlying-objects-2.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/underlying-objects-2.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -basicaa -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output  < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ; This loop:
 ;

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/unsafe-and-rt-checks.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/unsafe-and-rt-checks.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/unsafe-and-rt-checks.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/unsafe-and-rt-checks.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes='loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output  < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ; Analyze this loop:
 ;   for (i = 0; i < n; i++)

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/wrapping-pointer-versioning.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/wrapping-pointer-versioning.ll?rev=274452&r1=274451&r2=274452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/wrapping-pointer-versioning.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/wrapping-pointer-versioning.ll Sat Jul  2 16:18:40 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -basicaa -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=LAA
+; RUN: opt -passes='require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -aa-pipeline='basic-aa' -disable-output < %s  2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=LAA
 ; RUN: opt -loop-versioning -S < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=LV
 
 target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list