[llvm] r273766 - MachineScheduler: Remember top/bottom choice in bidirectional scheduling

Matthias Braun via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jun 24 19:03:37 PDT 2016


Author: matze
Date: Fri Jun 24 21:03:36 2016
New Revision: 273766

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=273766&view=rev
Log:
MachineScheduler: Remember top/bottom choice in bidirectional scheduling

Remember the last choice for the top/bottom scheduling boundary in
bidirectional scheduling mode. The top choice should not change if we
schedule at the bottom and vice versa.

This allows us to improve compiletime: We only recalculate the best pick
for one border and re-use the cached top-pick from the other border.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19350

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.h
    llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp

Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.h
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.h?rev=273766&r1=273765&r2=273766&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.h (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.h Fri Jun 24 21:03:36 2016
@@ -779,6 +779,15 @@ public:
     unsigned DemandResIdx;
 
     CandPolicy(): ReduceLatency(false), ReduceResIdx(0), DemandResIdx(0) {}
+
+    bool operator==(const CandPolicy &RHS) const {
+      return ReduceLatency == RHS.ReduceLatency &&
+             ReduceResIdx == RHS.ReduceResIdx &&
+             DemandResIdx == RHS.DemandResIdx;
+    }
+    bool operator!=(const CandPolicy &RHS) const {
+      return !(*this == RHS);
+    }
   };
 
   /// Status of an instruction's critical resource consumption.
@@ -820,8 +829,17 @@ public:
     // Critical resource consumption of the best candidate.
     SchedResourceDelta ResDelta;
 
-    SchedCandidate(const CandPolicy &policy)
-      : Policy(policy), SU(nullptr), Reason(NoCand), AtTop(false) {}
+    SchedCandidate() { reset(CandPolicy()); }
+    SchedCandidate(const CandPolicy &Policy) { reset(Policy); }
+
+    void reset(const CandPolicy &NewPolicy) {
+      Policy = NewPolicy;
+      SU = nullptr;
+      Reason = NoCand;
+      AtTop = false;
+      RPDelta = RegPressureDelta();
+      ResDelta = SchedResourceDelta();
+    }
 
     bool isValid() const { return SU; }
 
@@ -866,6 +884,11 @@ class GenericScheduler : public GenericS
   SchedBoundary Top;
   SchedBoundary Bot;
 
+  /// Candidate last picked from Top boundary.
+  SchedCandidate TopCand;
+  /// Candidate last picked from Bot boundary.
+  SchedCandidate BotCand;
+
   MachineSchedPolicy RegionPolicy;
 public:
   GenericScheduler(const MachineSchedContext *C):
@@ -894,10 +917,12 @@ public:
 
   void releaseTopNode(SUnit *SU) override {
     Top.releaseTopNode(SU);
+    TopCand.SU = nullptr;
   }
 
   void releaseBottomNode(SUnit *SU) override {
     Bot.releaseBottomNode(SU);
+    BotCand.SU = nullptr;
   }
 
   void registerRoots() override;

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp?rev=273766&r1=273765&r2=273766&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp Fri Jun 24 21:03:36 2016
@@ -2557,6 +2557,8 @@ void GenericScheduler::initialize(Schedu
         DAG->MF.getSubtarget().getInstrInfo()->CreateTargetMIHazardRecognizer(
             Itin, DAG);
   }
+  TopCand.SU = nullptr;
+  BotCand.SU = nullptr;
 }
 
 /// Initialize the per-region scheduling policy.
@@ -2954,17 +2956,56 @@ SUnit *GenericScheduler::pickNodeBidirec
   CandPolicy TopPolicy;
   setPolicy(TopPolicy, /*IsPostRA=*/false, Top, &Bot);
 
-  // Prefer bottom scheduling when heuristics are silent.
-  CandPolicy NoPolicy;
-  SchedCandidate Cand(NoPolicy);
+  // See if BotCand is still valid (because we previously scheduled from Top).
   DEBUG(dbgs() << "Picking from Bot:\n");
-  pickNodeFromQueue(Bot, BotPolicy, DAG->getBotRPTracker(), Cand);
-  assert(Cand.Reason != NoCand && "failed to find the first candidate");
+  if (!BotCand.isValid() || BotCand.SU->isScheduled ||
+      BotCand.Policy != BotPolicy) {
+    BotCand.reset(CandPolicy());
+    pickNodeFromQueue(Bot, BotPolicy, DAG->getBotRPTracker(), BotCand);
+    assert(BotCand.Reason != NoCand && "failed to find the first candidate");
+  } else {
+    DEBUG(traceCandidate(BotCand));
+#ifndef NDEBUG
+    if (VerifyScheduling) {
+      SchedCandidate TCand;
+      TCand.reset(CandPolicy());
+      pickNodeFromQueue(Bot, BotPolicy, DAG->getBotRPTracker(), TCand);
+      assert(TCand.SU == BotCand.SU &&
+             "Last pick result should correspond to re-picking right now");
+    }
+#endif
+  }
 
   // Check if the top Q has a better candidate.
   DEBUG(dbgs() << "Picking from Top:\n");
-  pickNodeFromQueue(Top, TopPolicy, DAG->getTopRPTracker(), Cand);
-  assert(Cand.Reason != NoCand && "failed to find the first candidate");
+  if (!TopCand.isValid() || TopCand.SU->isScheduled ||
+      TopCand.Policy != TopPolicy) {
+    TopCand.reset(CandPolicy());
+    pickNodeFromQueue(Top, TopPolicy, DAG->getTopRPTracker(), TopCand);
+    assert(TopCand.Reason != NoCand && "failed to find the first candidate");
+  } else {
+    DEBUG(traceCandidate(TopCand));
+#ifndef NDEBUG
+    if (VerifyScheduling) {
+      SchedCandidate TCand;
+      TCand.reset(CandPolicy());
+      pickNodeFromQueue(Top, TopPolicy, DAG->getTopRPTracker(), TCand);
+      assert(TCand.SU == TopCand.SU &&
+           "Last pick result should correspond to re-picking right now");
+    }
+#endif
+  }
+
+  // Pick best from BotCand and TopCand.
+  assert(BotCand.isValid());
+  assert(TopCand.isValid());
+  SchedCandidate Cand = BotCand;
+  TopCand.Reason = NoCand;
+  tryCandidate(Cand, TopCand, nullptr);
+  if (TopCand.Reason != NoCand) {
+    Cand.setBest(TopCand);
+    DEBUG(traceCandidate(Cand));
+  }
 
   IsTopNode = Cand.AtTop;
   tracePick(Cand);
@@ -2984,7 +3025,7 @@ SUnit *GenericScheduler::pickNode(bool &
       SU = Top.pickOnlyChoice();
       if (!SU) {
         CandPolicy NoPolicy;
-        SchedCandidate TopCand(NoPolicy);
+        TopCand.reset(NoPolicy);
         pickNodeFromQueue(Top, NoPolicy, DAG->getTopRPTracker(), TopCand);
         assert(TopCand.Reason != NoCand && "failed to find a candidate");
         tracePick(TopCand);
@@ -2995,7 +3036,7 @@ SUnit *GenericScheduler::pickNode(bool &
       SU = Bot.pickOnlyChoice();
       if (!SU) {
         CandPolicy NoPolicy;
-        SchedCandidate BotCand(NoPolicy);
+        BotCand.reset(NoPolicy);
         pickNodeFromQueue(Bot, NoPolicy, DAG->getBotRPTracker(), BotCand);
         assert(BotCand.Reason != NoCand && "failed to find a candidate");
         tracePick(BotCand);




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list