Impact of ltoing lld

Rui Ueyama via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 25 09:07:46 PDT 2016


Ah, nice. FWIW, it seems that we are keeping (or gradually widening?) the
gap against gold. I'm currently seeing that LLD is about 45% faster than
gold when linking clang (with and without debug info) on my machine with
SSD.

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Rafael EspĂ­ndola <
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> I just wanted to shared that I benchmarked lld and a ltoed lld and lto
> helps quite a bit. When comparing the two a chromium link got 1.057
> times faster :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20160525/56b375cd/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list