Warnings and compile-time failure on 458.sjeng

[Xinliang David Li via llvm-commits]

Fix is on the way.

David

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com> wrote:

>
> > On May 23, 2016, at 12:19 PM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com> wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > I think one of the SPEC2006 tests doesn't have enough
> statically-allocated VP nodes per site. We're seeing:
> >
> > > "Child terminated by signal 25" (SIGXFSZ) after:
> >
> > Is this related?
>
> I don't think so. I suspect that's happening because the device is
> overloaded with logging info.
>
>
> > >
> > > LLVM Profile Warning: Running out of nodes:
> site_0 at func_12822962448227433604, value=4295054468
> > > ...
> > > LLVM Profile Warning: Running out of nodes:
> site_0 at func_12822962448227433604, value=4295052980
> > > LLVM Profile Warning: Running out of nodes: site_0 at func_12822962
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/Performance_ARM64_SPEC2006_INT-O3_LTO_PGO-master/spec2006/cur_run/nt/build/LNTBased/speccpu2006/int/458.sjeng
> >
> > It seems like the fix for now is to either tweak vp-counters-per-site
> for the test or to set -vp-static-alloc=false.
> >
> > In the long term, do you think it's worth adjusting vp-counters-per-site
> s.t we can run SPEC without modifications? If so, is SPEC the right testbed?
> >
> > Rong had helped collecting SPEC related statistics, but looks like there
> is something missing.  I will investigate. In the meantime, can you try the
> workaround?
>
> Yes, we'll do that.
>
> Here's all the logging info from our bot:
>
>
>
>
>
> thanks,
> vedant
>
>
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> > vedant
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20160523/6a1eff21/attachment.html>