[PATCH] D20477: [x86, AVX] don't add a vzeroupper if that's what the code is already doing (PR27823)

Amjad Aboud via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun May 22 03:47:46 PDT 2016

Previous message: [PATCH] D20477: [x86, AVX] don't add a vzeroupper if that's what the code is already doing (PR27823)
Next message: [PATCH] D20477: [x86, AVX] don't add a vzeroupper if that's what the code is already doing (PR27823)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

aaboud accepted this revision.
aaboud added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

LGTM.
+1 for adding the test Simon mentioned.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D20477

Previous message: [PATCH] D20477: [x86, AVX] don't add a vzeroupper if that's what the code is already doing (PR27823)
Next message: [PATCH] D20477: [x86, AVX] don't add a vzeroupper if that's what the code is already doing (PR27823)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list