[PATCH] D13741: Introduce a *draft* of a code of conduct for the LLVM community and theassociated reporting guide.

[Philip Reames via llvm-commits]

reames added a comment.

Overall, I'm very happy with the revised version.

I like most of rengolin minor wording comments.  +1 to those I haven't explicitly replied to.


================
Comment at: docs/ReportingGuide.rst:48
@@ +47,3 @@
+* Names (real, nicknames, or pseudonyms) of any individuals involved. If there
+  were other witnesses besides you, please try to include them as well.
+* When and where the incident occurred. Please be as specific as possible.
----------------
rengolin wrote:
> Including other people may need asking them first. Some people really don't like to be pulled into a conflict that is not theirs.
Disagree.  Individuals can certainly chose to stay out of a situation or not comment, but it should not be the reporters responsibility to establish that.  That's the appropriate role for the advisory board.  

================
Comment at: docs/ReportingGuide.rst:75
@@ +74,3 @@
+
+The working group may choose to contact other parties involved or witnessing
+the event to gain clarity on what happened and understand any different
----------------
rengolin wrote:
> chandlerc wrote:
> > Philip, you had suggested wording here to me offline that said "may choose", I wonder if it would be better to say "will try"?
> > 
> > While it may not be possible or reasonable to do, I think that every effort need to be made here. Thoughts?
> "will try" is better, as "may choose" indicates you don't need to even try.
> 
> I think you really ought (try to) to contact *all* affected parties before *any* decision is taken, and this need to be clear.
I agree that "will try" is an improvement over my original wording.  


http://reviews.llvm.org/D13741