[PATCH] D19641: Add an alternative to LLVMMDNode that will only accept metadata as argument.

[James Y Knight via llvm-commits]

jyknight added a comment.

I don't understand this change (maybe the description just needs more context?).

Is the intention to later introduce an LLVMMetadataRef type, and these new functions will use that instead of LLVMValueRef, then? If so, why isn't introducing them with LLVMValueRef now problematic?


http://reviews.llvm.org/D19641