[PATCH] D19641: Add an alternative to LLVMMDNode that will only accept metadata as argument.
James Y Knight via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 27 19:38:54 PDT 2016
jyknight added a comment.
I don't understand this change (maybe the description just needs more context?).
Is the intention to later introduce an LLVMMetadataRef type, and these new functions will use that instead of LLVMValueRef, then? If so, why isn't introducing them with LLVMValueRef now problematic?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19641
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list