[PATCH] Fix a couple of use-after-frees in X86ISelDAGToDAG

Justin Bogner via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Apr 12 14:41:21 PDT 2016


Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote:
>> Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com> writes:
>>> Looks like the only uses are DL/VT; maybe just get those earlier (and
>>> explain in a comment)?
>>
>> You're right. The attached works. It's still pretty fragile / easy to
>> get wrong obviously, but it's a strict improvement for now.
>
> Yeah, it's a start.. LGTM.

r266130

>>> Also, I thought SelectionDAGISel.cpp had the same issues.  You do
>>> mention ISD::DELETED_NODE in the PR; I guess you have a plan to get
>>> rid of that?
>>
>> The ISD::DELETED_NODE stuff is a little bit more involved, largely since
>> the use-after-frees are very intentional there. I've been experimenting
>> with ways to clean that up, but I'm fixing up the other places in LLVM
>> where we have these problems while I'm at it.
>
> Sounds good; good luck!
>
> -Ahmed
>
>>> -Ahmed
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Justin Bogner
>>> <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote:
>>>> While looking at llvm.org/PR26808 I found a couple of use-after-frees in
>>>> X86ISelDAGToDAG, where we RAUW a node and then try to keep using it. The
>>>> attached patch fixes the tests that crash under ASan, but it feels a bit
>>>> targetted and kludgy. I'm afraid a robust fix would involve a lot of
>>>> refactoring of how X86ISelDAGToDAG works though, and I certainly won't
>>>> be able to do that any time soon.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list