[polly] r264118 - [ScopInfo] Fix domains after loops.

[Michael Kruse via llvm-commits]

2016-04-04 16:34 GMT+02:00 Johannes Doerfert <doerfert at cs.uni-saarland.de>:
> On 04/04, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>> On 04/04/2016 01:34 PM, Michael Kruse wrote:
>> >2016-04-04 11:55 GMT+02:00 Johannes Doerfert <doerfert at cs.uni-saarland.de>:
>>
>> >>>Your example above suggests that you have a correctness issue in mind. As
>> >>>said above, do we already have (or can we draft) such a test case?
>> >>>
>> >>>>D18450 cannot help when the loop
>> >>>>has multiple exits.
>> >>>
>> >>>Agreed. And for whatever reason it also did not fix the bug we see on LNT.
>> >>That statement is not helping. AFAIK, there is little evidence that the
>> >>additional constraints cause the lnt failure.
>> >
>> >Huh?
>>
>> Even though I think we managed to move to a very productive discussion
>> culture (thanks to both of you for this!), I wanted to briefly remind that
>> some phrases unintentionally may be perceived in ways we did not expect.
>>
>> Both, 'That statement is not helping' as well as 'Huh' might belong in this
>> category. (Not claiming I don't unintentionally reply in such way sometimes
>> as well).
> Your right. I tried various phrasings and should have used a different
> one.

I agree; I should have learned already that interjections are not
appropriate un public email communication.

Michael