[llvm] r264746 - [SCEV] Use Operator::getOpcode instead of manual dispatch; NFC
Sanjoy Das via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 29 09:40:39 PDT 2016
Author: sanjoy
Date: Tue Mar 29 11:40:39 2016
New Revision: 264746
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=264746&view=rev
Log:
[SCEV] Use Operator::getOpcode instead of manual dispatch; NFC
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp?rev=264746&r1=264745&r2=264746&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp Tue Mar 29 11:40:39 2016
@@ -4730,29 +4730,24 @@ const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createSCEV(
if (!isSCEVable(V->getType()))
return getUnknown(V);
- unsigned Opcode = Instruction::UserOp1;
if (Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V)) {
- Opcode = I->getOpcode();
-
// Don't attempt to analyze instructions in blocks that aren't
// reachable. Such instructions don't matter, and they aren't required
// to obey basic rules for definitions dominating uses which this
// analysis depends on.
if (!DT.isReachableFromEntry(I->getParent()))
return getUnknown(V);
- } else if (ConstantExpr *CE = dyn_cast<ConstantExpr>(V))
- Opcode = CE->getOpcode();
- else if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(V))
+ } else if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(V))
return getConstant(CI);
else if (isa<ConstantPointerNull>(V))
return getZero(V->getType());
else if (GlobalAlias *GA = dyn_cast<GlobalAlias>(V))
return GA->mayBeOverridden() ? getUnknown(V) : getSCEV(GA->getAliasee());
- else
+ else if (!isa<ConstantExpr>(V))
return getUnknown(V);
Operator *U = cast<Operator>(V);
- switch (Opcode) {
+ switch (U->getOpcode()) {
case Instruction::Add: {
// The simple thing to do would be to just call getSCEV on both operands
// and call getAddExpr with the result. However if we're looking at a
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list