[PATCH] D18223: Codegen: Decrease minimum jump table density
Kyle Butt via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 22 09:54:55 PDT 2016
When I re-ran the TSVC tests 100 times on a quieter machine, all the
differences were less than 2%.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Kyle Butt <kyle+llvm at iteratee.net> wrote:
> iteratee added a comment.
>
> Key: for each run avg, median, stddev (stddev as a percent), 10th
> percentile.
> %Change: avg, median, 10th percentile. %Change is change in runtime, so
> negative percent is an improvement.
>
> Unchanged is listed first.
>
> I'm only showing the tests with a difference of more than 2 percent.
> I ran each of these benchmarks 50 times.
>
> The only significant results are in TSVC. I'll see how many benchmarks
> that is and maybe run them more times.
>
> test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 7.014
> 7.012 0.290 (4.130%) 6.672
> test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 7.021
> 7.011 0.199 (2.835%) 6.807
> % Change: -0.016 % -0.016 % 2.013 %
> test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac.test
> 0.924 0.926 0.054 (5.828%) 0.857
> test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac.test
> 0.914 0.907 0.042 (4.616%) 0.858
> % Change: -1.993 % -1.993 % 0.163 %
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl/Equivalencing-dbl.test
> 1.976 1.964 0.109 (5.525%) 1.840
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl/Equivalencing-dbl.test
> 2.000 1.959 0.122 (6.075%) 1.882
> % Change: -0.242 % -0.242 % 2.288 %
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt.test
> 1.246 1.233 0.091 (7.321%) 1.144
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt.test
> 1.239 1.219 0.066 (5.311%) 1.169
> % Change: -1.172 % -1.172 % 2.211 %
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Expansion-flt/Expansion-flt.test 1.745
> 1.751 0.096 (5.491%) 1.628
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Expansion-flt/Expansion-flt.test 1.732
> 1.706 0.095 (5.460%) 1.630
> % Change: -2.601 % -2.601 % 0.086 %
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl.test
> 3.115 3.097 0.110 (3.546%) 2.982
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl.test
> 3.190 3.171 0.124 (3.872%) 3.048
> % Change: 2.392 % 2.392 % 2.220 %
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/InductionVariable-dbl/InductionVariable-dbl.test
> 3.691 3.673 0.177 (4.787%) 3.512
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/InductionVariable-dbl/InductionVariable-dbl.test
> 3.685 3.667 0.181 (4.925%) 3.442
> % Change: -0.162 % -0.162 % -1.988 %
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-dbl/LinearDependence-dbl.test
> 3.191 3.140 0.193 (6.044%) 2.978
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-dbl/LinearDependence-dbl.test
> 3.233 3.236 0.159 (4.908%) 3.051
> % Change: 3.070 % 3.070 % 2.478 %
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-dbl/LoopRerolling-dbl.test
> 3.557 3.524 0.166 (4.669%) 3.378
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-dbl/LoopRerolling-dbl.test
> 3.577 3.556 0.118 (3.286%) 3.458
> % Change: 0.899 % 0.899 % 2.374 %
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-flt/LoopRestructuring-flt.test
> 3.480 3.457 0.161 (4.639%) 3.292
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-flt/LoopRestructuring-flt.test
> 3.520 3.493 0.128 (3.642%) 3.382
> % Change: 1.053 % 1.053 % 2.721 %
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-dbl/NodeSplitting-dbl.test
> 3.411 3.379 0.176 (5.147%) 3.211
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-dbl/NodeSplitting-dbl.test
> 3.469 3.459 0.168 (4.856%) 3.275
> % Change: 2.372 % 2.372 % 2.009 %
> test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-flt/Packing-flt.test
> 2.399 2.354 0.156 (6.496%) 2.228
> test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-flt/Packing-flt.test
> 2.415 2.415 0.099 (4.110%) 2.266
> % Change: 2.594 % 2.594 % 1.705 %
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Recurrences-flt/Recurrences-flt.test 3.480
> 3.449 0.142 (4.087%) 3.349
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Recurrences-flt/Recurrences-flt.test 3.409
> 3.412 0.110 (3.237%) 3.266
> % Change: -1.089 % -1.089 % -2.467 %
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-dbl/Searching-dbl.test 2.778
> 2.749 0.137 (4.941%) 2.632
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-dbl/Searching-dbl.test 2.825
> 2.824 0.135 (4.784%) 2.648
> % Change: 2.715 % 2.715 % 0.581 %
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt.test 1.002
> 1.002 0.077 (7.686%) 0.919
> test-suite ::
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt.test 1.041
> 1.043 0.069 (6.591%) 0.962
> % Change: 4.099 % 4.099 % 4.579 %
>
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D18223
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20160322/a4f1f76c/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list