[PATCH] D18160: [MC] Rename TLSCALL as it's not ARM specific

[Davide Italiano via llvm-commits]

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> rengolin added a comment.
>
> No objections from me, if the semantics are identical on all targets. AFAIK, they are, so... LGTM.
>
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D18160
>
>
>

I originally discussed this with Saleem and he suggested to introduce
_X86_64 and _ARM_ variant but after a closer look I don't think
they're really required. I'll leave this here for a bit in case
somebody disagrees.