[PATCH] D17429: Don't mark convergent instructions as trivially rematerializable.

Justin Lebar via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 29 17:34:10 PST 2016

Previous message: [PATCH] D17518: [ifcnv] Add comment explaining why it's OK to duplicate convergent MIs in ifcnv.
Next message: [PATCH] D17423: [NVPTX] Use different, convergent MIs for convergent calls.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

jlebar added a comment.

Friendly ping.  Would be good to have this figured out before we all lose state.  :)


http://reviews.llvm.org/D17429

Previous message: [PATCH] D17518: [ifcnv] Add comment explaining why it's OK to duplicate convergent MIs in ifcnv.
Next message: [PATCH] D17423: [NVPTX] Use different, convergent MIs for convergent calls.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list