[PATCH] D16986: [LICM] Don't assert on volatile accesses

[Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-commits]

kparzysz added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16986#364339, @nlopes wrote:

> Given that the perf of volatile stuff is probably a non-issue (I don't have any data; just guessing), I would prefer to go the conservative path.


It is actually important to our (Hexagon) customers.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D16986