[PATCH] D17641: [Polly] [MemAccInst] Delete all the assignment operators, as they are not need.

[Hongbin Zheng via llvm-commits]

etherzhhb marked an inline comment as done.
etherzhhb added a comment.

I think I address the wrong question. The right question is:

Should we make all MemAccInst become "const MemAccInst" to guarantee that we do not change the underlying instruction once it is built?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

http://reviews.llvm.org/D17641