[llvm] r252578 - Support for emitting inline stack probes
Andy Ayers via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Feb 21 17:58:40 PST 2016
We don't expect any bundles here, so the instr_iterator seems correct.
-----Original Message-----
From: dexonsmith at apple.com [mailto:dexonsmith at apple.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 3:06 PM
To: Andy Ayers <andya at microsoft.com>
Cc: llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [llvm] r252578 - Support for emitting inline stack probes
> On 2015-Nov-09, at 17:50, Andy Ayers via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
> + if (ChkStkStub != nullptr) {
> + MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI =
> + std::next(ChkStkStub->getIterator());
I noticed this (and added a FIXME) in r261504. getIterator() (now called getInstrIterator()) returns a MachineBasicBlock::instr_iterator.
Did you want to increment a MachineBasicBlock::iterator (a bundle iterator?).
- If so, there's now convenient API: getBundleIterator().
- If not, let me know, and I'll remove the FIXME I added.
> + assert(std::prev(MBBI).operator==(ChkStkStub) &&
> + "MBBI expected after __chkstk_stub.");
> + DebugLoc DL = PrologMBB.findDebugLoc(MBBI);
> + emitStackProbeInline(MF, PrologMBB, MBBI, DL, true);
> + ChkStkStub->eraseFromParent();
> + }
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list