[llvm] r260695 - [InstCombine] Don't aggressively replace xor with icmp
David Majnemer via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Feb 12 10:12:38 PST 2016
Author: majnemer
Date: Fri Feb 12 12:12:38 2016
New Revision: 260695
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260695&view=rev
Log:
[InstCombine] Don't aggressively replace xor with icmp
For some cases, InstCombine replaces the sequence of xor/sub instruction
followed by cmp instruction into a single cmp instruction.
However, this replacement may result suboptimal result especially when
the xor/sub has more than one use, as discussed in
bug 26465 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26465).
This patch make the replacement happen only when xor/sub has only one
use.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16915
Patch by Taewook Oh!
Added:
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/prevent-cmp-merge.ll
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp?rev=260695&r1=260694&r2=260695&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp Fri Feb 12 12:12:38 2016
@@ -2212,27 +2212,30 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInst
}
break;
case Instruction::Xor:
- // For the xor case, we can xor two constants together, eliminating
- // the explicit xor.
- if (Constant *BOC = dyn_cast<Constant>(BO->getOperand(1))) {
- return new ICmpInst(ICI.getPredicate(), BO->getOperand(0),
- ConstantExpr::getXor(RHS, BOC));
- } else if (RHSV == 0) {
- // Replace ((xor A, B) != 0) with (A != B)
- return new ICmpInst(ICI.getPredicate(), BO->getOperand(0),
- BO->getOperand(1));
+ if (BO->hasOneUse()) {
+ if (Constant *BOC = dyn_cast<Constant>(BO->getOperand(1))) {
+ // For the xor case, we can xor two constants together, eliminating
+ // the explicit xor.
+ return new ICmpInst(ICI.getPredicate(), BO->getOperand(0),
+ ConstantExpr::getXor(RHS, BOC));
+ } else if (RHSV == 0) {
+ // Replace ((xor A, B) != 0) with (A != B)
+ return new ICmpInst(ICI.getPredicate(), BO->getOperand(0),
+ BO->getOperand(1));
+ }
}
break;
case Instruction::Sub:
- // Replace ((sub A, B) != C) with (B != A-C) if A & C are constants.
- if (ConstantInt *BOp0C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(BO->getOperand(0))) {
- if (BO->hasOneUse())
+ if (BO->hasOneUse()) {
+ if (ConstantInt *BOp0C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(BO->getOperand(0))) {
+ // Replace ((sub A, B) != C) with (B != A-C) if A & C are constants.
return new ICmpInst(ICI.getPredicate(), BO->getOperand(1),
- ConstantExpr::getSub(BOp0C, RHS));
- } else if (RHSV == 0) {
- // Replace ((sub A, B) != 0) with (A != B)
- return new ICmpInst(ICI.getPredicate(), BO->getOperand(0),
- BO->getOperand(1));
+ ConstantExpr::getSub(BOp0C, RHS));
+ } else if (RHSV == 0) {
+ // Replace ((sub A, B) != 0) with (A != B)
+ return new ICmpInst(ICI.getPredicate(), BO->getOperand(0),
+ BO->getOperand(1));
+ }
}
break;
case Instruction::Or:
Added: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/prevent-cmp-merge.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/prevent-cmp-merge.ll?rev=260695&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/prevent-cmp-merge.ll (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/prevent-cmp-merge.ll Fri Feb 12 12:12:38 2016
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+; RUN: opt < %s -instcombine -S | FileCheck %s
+;
+; This test makes sure that InstCombine does not replace the sequence of
+; xor/sub instruction followed by cmp instruction into a single cmp instruction
+; if there is more than one use of xor/sub.
+
+define zeroext i1 @test1(i32 %lhs, i32 %rhs) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test1(
+; CHECK-NEXT: %xor = xor i32 %lhs, 5
+; CHECK-NEXT: %cmp1 = icmp eq i32 %xor, 10
+
+ %xor = xor i32 %lhs, 5
+ %cmp1 = icmp eq i32 %xor, 10
+ %cmp2 = icmp eq i32 %xor, %rhs
+ %sel = or i1 %cmp1, %cmp2
+ ret i1 %sel
+}
+
+define zeroext i1 @test2(i32 %lhs, i32 %rhs) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test2(
+; CHECK-NEXT: %xor = xor i32 %lhs, %rhs
+; CHECK-NEXT: %cmp1 = icmp eq i32 %xor, 0
+
+ %xor = xor i32 %lhs, %rhs
+ %cmp1 = icmp eq i32 %xor, 0
+ %cmp2 = icmp eq i32 %xor, 32
+ %sel = xor i1 %cmp1, %cmp2
+ ret i1 %sel
+}
+
+define zeroext i1 @test3(i32 %lhs, i32 %rhs) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test3(
+; CHECK-NEXT: %sub = sub nsw i32 %lhs, %rhs
+; CHECK-NEXT: %cmp1 = icmp eq i32 %sub, 0
+
+ %sub = sub nsw i32 %lhs, %rhs
+ %cmp1 = icmp eq i32 %sub, 0
+ %cmp2 = icmp eq i32 %sub, 31
+ %sel = or i1 %cmp1, %cmp2
+ ret i1 %sel
+}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list