Re: Builder lld-x86_64-win7​ is back

[Rui Ueyama via llvm-commits]

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-commits <
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:40:06PM -0800, Rui Ueyama via llvm-commits
> wrote:
> > Tried to fix the warning, and I'm not now sure if the warning makes
> sense.
> > These "'~': zero extending '<smaller integer type>' to 'int64_t' of
> greater
> > size" warning may be annoying as it is issued for code like "int64_t x =
> > ~<some-int32_t-var>".
>
> This sounds like something were the semantic of the code is not
> obviously what was originally intended.
>

So you thought that was useful? Then why doesn't clang/gcc warn on that?


>
> Joerg
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20160209/f99df456/attachment.html>