[PATCH] D16956: [X86][SSE1] Add MOVLHPS/MOVHLPS lowering and memory folding support
Sanjay Patel via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Feb 7 09:08:49 PST 2016
spatel added a comment.
Shouldn't MOVHPS/MOVLPS/MOVLHPS/MOVHLPS be in "hasPartialRegUpdate()"? I wonder if the partial reg update is why we weren't trying to lower these before.
If that's correct, I think a FIXME comment is fine for now.
================
Comment at: lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp:5541-5549
@@ +5540,11 @@
+ if (OpNum == 2) {
+ unsigned RCSize = getRegClass(MI->getDesc(), OpNum, &RI, MF)->getSize();
+ if (Size <= RCSize && 8 <= Align) {
+ unsigned NewOpCode =
+ (MI->getOpcode() == X86::VMOVHLPSrr ? X86::VMOVLPSrm
+ : X86::MOVLPSrm);
+ MachineInstr *NewMI =
+ FuseInst(MF, NewOpCode, OpNum, MOs, InsertPt, MI, *this, 8);
+ return NewMI;
+ }
+ }
----------------
Extra indent here.
================
Comment at: lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp:5542
@@ +5541,3 @@
+ unsigned RCSize = getRegClass(MI->getDesc(), OpNum, &RI, MF)->getSize();
+ if (Size <= RCSize && 8 <= Align) {
+ unsigned NewOpCode =
----------------
Does the AVX case doesn't need the alignment restriction? I don't think we'd actually generate this instruction in the first place if we have AVX, so it might be a moot point. But maybe worthy of a code comment.
Repository:
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16956
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list